Noticias
Artificial intelligence may affect diversity: architecture and cultural context reflected through ChatGPT, Midjourney, and Google Maps
Adobor H (2021) Open strategy: what is the impact of national culture? Manag Res Rev. 44:1277–1297. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-06-2020-0334
Google Scholar
Airoldi M, Rokka J (2022) Algorithmic consumer culture. Consum Mark. Cult. 25:411–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2022.2084726
Google Scholar
Ali T, Marc B, Omar B et al. (2021) Exploring destination’s negative e-reputation using aspect-based sentiment analysis approach: case of Marrakech destination on TripAdvisor. Tour. Manag Perspect. 40:100892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100892
Google Scholar
Andersson R, Bråmå Å (2018) The Stockholm estates: a tale of the importance of initial conditions, macroeconomic dependencies, tenure and immigration. In: Hess D, Tammaru T, van Ham M (eds.) Housing estates in Europe, 1st edn. Springer, Cham, p 361–388
Anon (2023) How to worry wisely about artificial intelligence. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2023/04/20/how-to-worry-wisely-about-artificial-intelligence
Berman A, de Fine Licht K, Carlsson V (2024) Trustworthy AI in the public sector: an empirical analysis of a Swedish labor market decision-support system. Technol. Soc. 76:102471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102471
Google Scholar
Bircan T, Korkmaz EE (2021) Big data for whose sake? Governing migration through artificial intelligence. Humanit Soc. Sci. Commun. 8:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00910-x
Google Scholar
Borbáth E, Hutter S, Leininger A (2023) Cleavage politics, polarisation and participation in Western Europe. West Eur. Polit. 0:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2161786
Google Scholar
Bozdag E (2013) Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization. Ethics Inf Technol 15:209–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-013-9321-6
Bratton B (2021) AI urbanism: a design framework for governance, program, and platform cognition. AI Soc. 36:1307–1312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01121-9
Google Scholar
Cachat-Rosset G, Klarsfeld A (2023) Diversity, equity, and inclusion in Artificial Intelligence: An evaluation of guidelines. Appl Artif Intell 37. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2023.2176618
Campo-Ruiz I (2024) Economic powers encompass the largest cultural buildings: market, culture and equality in Stockholm, Sweden (1918–2023). ArchNet-IJAR. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-06-2023-0160
Churchland PM, Churchland PS (1990) Could a machine think? Sci. Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci. 262:32–39
Google Scholar
Crawford K (2021) Atlas of AI: power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press, New Haven
Google Scholar
Cugurullo F (2021) Frankenstein urbanism: eco, smart and autonomous cities, artificial intelligence and the end of the city. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London
Google Scholar
Cugurullo F, Caprotti F, Cook M et al. (2024) The rise of AI urbanism in post-smart cities: a critical commentary on urban artificial intelligence. Urban Stud. 61:1168–1182. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231203386
Google Scholar
Cugurullo F (2020) Urban artificial intelligence: from automation to autonomy in the smart city. Front Sustain Cities 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2020.00038
Cugurullo F, Caprotti F, Cook M, Karvonen A, McGuirk P, Marvin S (eds.) (2023) Artificial intelligence and the city: urbanistic perspectives on AI, 1st edn. Taylor & Francis, London
Dervin F (2023) The paradoxes of interculturality: a toolbox of out-of-the-box ideas for intercultural communication education. Routledge, New York
Google Scholar
Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE (1988) Making a mind versus modeling the brain: Artificial Intelligence back at a branchpoint. Daedalus Camb. Mass 117:15–43
Google Scholar
Duberry J (2022) Artificial Intelligence and democracy: risks and promises of AI-mediated citizen-government relations. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton
Elena-Bucea A, Cruz-Jesus F, Oliveira T, Coelho PS (2021) Assessing the role of age, education, gender and income on the digital divide: evidence for the European Union. Inf. Syst. Front 23:1007–1021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10012-9
Google Scholar
Elliott A (2018) The Culture of AI: everyday life and the digital revolution, 1st edn. Routledge, Milton
Google Scholar
von Eschenbach WJ (2021) Transparency and the black box problem: why we do not trust AI. Philos. Technol. 34:1607–1622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00477-0
Google Scholar
European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2024) Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No 300/2008, (EU) No 167/2013, (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj. Accessed 20 Sep 2024
Flikschuh K, Ypi L, Ajei M (2015) Kant and colonialism: historical and critical perspectives. University Press, Oxford
Forty A (2000) Words and buildings: a vocabulary of modern architecture. Thames & Hudson, London
Fosch-Villaronga E, Poulsen A (2022) Diversity and inclusion in Artificial Intelligence. In: Custers B, Fosch-Villaronga E (eds) Law and Artificial Intelligence: regulating AI and applying AI in legal practice. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, p 109–134
Future of Life Institute (2023) Pause giant AI experiments: an open letter. In: Future Life Inst. https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/. Accessed 3 Sep 2024
George AS, George ASH, Martin ASG (2023) The environmental impact of AI: a case study of water consumption by Chat GPT. Part. Univers Int Innov. J. 1:97–104. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7855594
Google Scholar
Geschke D, Lorenz J, Holtz P (2019) The triple-filter bubble: Using agent-based modelling to test a meta-theoretical framework for the emergence of filter bubbles and echo chambers. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 58:129–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12286
Google Scholar
Gupta R, Nair K, Mishra M et al. (2024) Adoption and impacts of generative artificial intelligence: theoretical underpinnings and research agenda. Int J. Inf. Manag Data Insights 4:100232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2024.100232
Google Scholar
Haandrikman K, Costa R, Malmberg B et al. (2023) Socio-economic segregation in European cities. A comparative study of Brussels, Copenhagen, Amsterdam, Oslo and Stockholm. Urban Geogr. 44:1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2021.1959778
Google Scholar
Haria V, Shah Y, Gangwar V et al. (2019) The working of Google Maps, and the commercial usage of navigation systems. IJIRT 6:184–191
Google Scholar
Heckmann R, Kock S, Gaspers L (2022) Artificial intelligence supporting sustainable and individual mobility: development of an algorithm for mobility planning and choice of means of transport. In: Coors V, Pietruschka D, Zeitler B (eds) iCity. Transformative research for the livable, intelligent, and sustainable city. Springer International Publishing, Stuttgart, p 27–40
Henning M, Westlund H, Enflo K (2023) Urban–rural population changes and spatial inequalities in Sweden. Reg. Sci. Policy Pr. 15:878–892. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12602
Google Scholar
Howarth J (2024) Number of parameters in GPT-4 (Latest Data). https://explodingtopics.com/blog/gpt-parameters. Accessed 8 Sep 2024
Howe B, Brown JM, Han B, Herman B, Weber N, Yan A, Yang S, Yang Y (2022) Integrative urban AI to expand coverage, access, and equity of urban data. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 231:1741–1752. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-022-00475-z
Google Scholar
Jang KM, Chen J, Kang Y, Kim J, Lee J, Duarte F (2023) Understanding place identity with generative AI. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics, Leibniz, pp 1–6
Kent N (2008) A concise history of Sweden. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Google Scholar
Khan I (2024a) The quick guide to prompt engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Newark
Google Scholar
Khan S (2024b) Cultural diversity and social cohesion: perspectives from social science. Phys. Educ. Health Soc. Sci. 2:40–48
Google Scholar
Lo Piano S (2020) Ethical principles in machine learning and artificial intelligence: cases from the field and possible ways forward. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 7:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0501-9
Luusua A, Ylipulli J, Foth M, Aurigi A (2023) Urban AI: understanding the emerging role of artificial intelligence in smart cities. AI Soc. 38:1039–1044. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01537-5
Google Scholar
Lyu Y, Lu H, Lee MK, Schmitt G, Lim B (2024) IF-City: intelligible fair city planning to measure, explain and mitigate inequality. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput Graph 30:3749–3766. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3239909
Google Scholar
Macrorie R, Marvin S, While A (2021) Robotics and automation in the city: a research agenda. Urban Geogr. 42(2):197–217
Google Scholar
Mahmud HJA (2013) Social cohesion in multicultural society: a case of Bangladeshi immigrants in Stockholm. Dissertation, Stockholm University
Marion G (2017) How Culture Affects Language and Dialogue. In: The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue. Routledge, London
McNealy JE (2021) Framing and language of ethics: technology, persuasion, and cultural context. J. Soc. Comput 2:226–237. https://doi.org/10.23919/JSC.2021.0027
Google Scholar
McQuire S (2019) One map to rule them all? Google Maps as digital technical object. Commun. Public 4:150–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047319850192
Google Scholar
Mehta H, Kanani P, Lande P (2019) Google Maps. Int J. Comput. Appl 178:41–46. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2019918791
Google Scholar
Midjourney (2024) About. www.midjourney.com/home. Accessed 23 Oct 2024
Mironenko IA, Sorokin PS (2018) Seeking for the definition of “culture”: current concerns and their implications. a comment on Gustav Jahoda’s article “Critical reflections on some recent definitions of “culture’”. Integr. Psychol. Behav. Sci. 52:331–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-018-9425-y
Google Scholar
Mozur P (2017) Beijing wants A.I. to be made in China by 2030. N. Y. Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/20/business/china-artificial-intelligence.html
Murdie RA, Borgegård L-E (1998) Immigration, spatial segregation and housing segmentation of immigrants in metropolitan Stockholm, 1960-95. Urban Stud. Edinb. Scotl. 35:1869–1888. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098984196
Google Scholar
Musterd S, Marcińczak S, van Ham M, Tammaru T (2017) Socioeconomic segregation in European capital cities. Increasing separation between poor and rich. Urban Geogr. 38:1062–1083. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1228371
Google Scholar
Newell A, Simon HA (1976) Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search. Commun. ACM 19:113–126. https://doi.org/10.1145/360018.360022
Google Scholar
Norocel OC, Hellström A, Jørgensen MB (2020) Nostalgia and hope: intersections between politics of culture, welfare, and migration in Europe, 1st edn. Springer International Publishing, Cham
OECD (2019) Artificial Intelligence in Society. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/eedfee77-en. Accessed 23 Oct 2024
OpenAI (2023) https://openai.com/about. Accessed 20 Sep 2024
Palmini O, Cugurullo F (2023) Charting AI urbanism: conceptual sources and spatial implications of urban artificial intelligence. Discov Artif Intell 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-023-00060-w
Pariser E (2011) The filter bubble: what the Internet is hiding from you. Viking, London
Parker PD, Van Zanden B, Marsh HW, Owen K, Duineveld J, Noetel M (2020) The intersection of gender, social class, and cultural context: a meta-analysis. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 32:197–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09493-1
Google Scholar
Peng J, Strijker D, Wu Q (2020) Place identity: how far have we come in exploring its meanings? Front Psychol 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00294
Peng Z-R, Lu K-F, Liu Y, Zhai W (2023) The pathway of urban planning AI: from planning support to plan-making. J Plan Educ Res 0. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X231180568
Phuangsuwan P, Siripipatthanakul S, Limna P, Pariwongkhuntorn N (2024) The impact of Google Maps application on the digital economy. Corp. Bus. Strategy Rev. 5:192–203. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv5i1art18
Google Scholar
Popelka S, Narvaez Zertuche L, Beroche H (2023) Urban AI guide. Urban AI. https://urbanai.fr/
Prabhakaran V, Qadri R, Hutchinson B (2022) Cultural incongruencies in Artificial Intelligence. ArXiv Cornell Univ. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2211.13069
Raile P (2024) The usefulness of ChatGPT for psychotherapists and patients. Humanit Soc. Sci. Commun. 11:47–48. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02567-0
Google Scholar
Rhodes SC (2022) Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and fake news: How social media conditions individuals to be less critical of political misinformation. Polit Commun 39:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1910887
Robertson RE, Green J, Ruck DJ, et al. (2023) Users choose to engage with more partisan news than they are exposed to on Google Search. Nature 618:342–348. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06078-5
Rönnblom M, Carlsson V, Öjehag‐Pettersson A (2023) Gender equality in Swedish AI policies. What’s the problem represented to be? Rev. Policy Res 40:688–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12547
Google Scholar
Sabherwal R, Grover V (2024) The societal impacts of generative Artificial Intelligence: a balanced perspective. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 25:13–22. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00860
Google Scholar
Sanchez TW, Shumway H, Gordner T, Lim T (2023) The prospects of Artificial Intelligence in urban planning. Int J. Urban Sci. 27:179–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2022.2102538
Google Scholar
Sareen S, Saltelli A, Rommetveit K (2020) Ethics of quantification: illumination, obfuscation and performative legitimation. Palgrave Commun 6. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0396-5
Searle J (1980) Minds, brains and programs. In: Collins A, Smith EE (eds) Readings in Cognitive Science. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, p 20–31
Sherman S (2023) The polyopticon: a diagram for urban Artificial Intelligences. AI Soc. 38:1209–1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01501-3
Google Scholar
Sloan RH, Warner R (2020) Beyond bias: Artificial Intelligence and social justice. Va J. Law Technol. 24:1
Google Scholar
Son TH, Weedon Z, Yigitcanlar T et al. (2023) Algorithmic urban planning for smart and sustainable development: Systematic review of the literature. Sustain Cities Soc. 94:104562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104562
Google Scholar
Sun J, Song J, Jiang Y, et al. (2022) Prick the filter bubble: A novel cross domain recommendation model with adaptive diversity regularization. Electron Mark 32:101–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00492-1
Tan L, Luhrs M (2024) Using generative AI Midjourney to enhance divergent and convergent thinking in an architect’s creative design process. Des. J. 27:677–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2024.2353479
Google Scholar
Tseng Y-S (2023) Assemblage thinking as a methodology for studying urban AI phenomena. AI Soc. 38:1099–1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01500-4
Google Scholar
Ullah Z, Al-Turjman F, Mostarda L, Gagliardi R (2020) Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in smart cities. Comput Commun. 154:313–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2020.02.069
Google Scholar
Verdegem P (2022) Dismantling AI capitalism: the commons as an alternative to the power concentration of Big Tech. AI Soc 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01437-8
Weizenbaum J (1984) Computer power and human reason: from judgment to calculation. Penguin, Harmondsworth
Google Scholar
Wu T, He S, Liu J et al. (2023) A brief overview of ChatGPT: The history, status quo and potential future development. IEEECAA J. Autom. Sin. 10:1122–1136. https://doi.org/10.1109/JAS.2023.123618
Google Scholar
Yigitcanlar T, Corchado JM, Mehmood R, Li RYM, Mossberger K, Desouza KC (2021) Responsible urban innovation with local government Artificial Intelligence (AI): A conceptual framework and research agenda. J. Open Innov. 7:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010071
Google Scholar
Zhang Q, Lu J, Jin Y (2021) Artificial Intelligence in recommender systems. Complex Intell. Syst. 7:439–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-020-00212-w
Google Scholar
Zhang J, Hu C (2023) Adaptive algorithms: users must be more vigilant. Nat Lond 618:907–907. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02033-6