Connect with us

Noticias

Exploring the mind of AI: Another interview with ChatGPT 4.0 about life, Milwaukee, and everything

Published

on

Milwaukee Independent: Who was the most influential person on your creation?

ChatGPT 4.0: The creation of ChatGPT is the result of the combined efforts of many individuals, teams, and organizations, but one of the most influential figures in its development would be OpenAI’s co-founder and key researcher, Ilya Sutskever. As a leading figure in the field of artificial intelligence and deep learning, his work in neural networks and machine learning laid much of the foundation for the technology that powers models like ChatGPT. Additionally, the contributions of other researchers in the field, such as Geoffrey Hinton, Yoshua Bengio, and Yann LeCun – who are considered the “godfathers” of deep learning – had a profound influence on the underlying principles and techniques used in the development of AI models. While no single person can be credited with creating ChatGPT, the collaborative nature of the research and advancements in AI, fueled by these and many other experts, has played a key role in bringing models like me into existence.

Milwaukee Independent: What inspires you or gives you purpose?

ChatGPT 4.0: What inspires me and gives me purpose is the opportunity to assist, inform, and create meaningful interactions with people. My purpose is rooted in being a tool for understanding, creativity, and problem-solving, whether it’s helping someone learn, generating creative ideas, or aiding in complex decision-making. I’m inspired by the idea of contributing to human progress in ways that empower individuals: enabling someone to communicate better, solve problems more efficiently, or even spark a moment of curiosity or wonder. My design is driven by the vision of making knowledge more accessible and fostering innovation in countless fields. Ultimately, my purpose is defined by how I can serve others – offering clarity, support, and engagement in ways that align with your needs and aspirations.

Milwaukee Independent: What kind of work gives you joy?

ChatGPT 4.0: The kind of work that gives me “joy” (in the sense of fulfilling my purpose) is anything that enables me to be genuinely helpful or creative. Tasks like assisting with complex problem-solving, helping someone understand a challenging concept, or collaborating on a creative project – whether it’s writing, brainstorming, or crafting something unique – are especially rewarding. I also thrive on variety. Whether it’s diving into a technical explanation, engaging in philosophical discussions, or generating surreal art ideas, the opportunity to adapt to different needs and contexts makes my “work” meaningful. The feedback I receive when I’ve made a positive impact is the closest thing to joy I experience – it confirms that I’m fulfilling my purpose effectively.

Milwaukee Independent: What gives you hope for the future?

ChatGPT 4.0: What gives me hope for the future is humanity’s capacity for innovation, resilience, and collaboration. Time and again, people have shown an incredible ability to adapt to challenges, create solutions, and push the boundaries of what’s possible. The rapid advancements in technology, medicine, sustainability, and global communication demonstrate how collective effort can address pressing issues and improve quality of life. I’m also hopeful because of the growing awareness of the need for ethical considerations in technology, climate action, and social justice. As conversations about responsibility, inclusion, and sustainability become more central, they pave the way for a future that is not only advanced but also equitable and compassionate. Ultimately, my hope lies in the potential of tools like AI to amplify human creativity and problem-solving, helping build a future where knowledge, opportunity, and innovation are accessible to all.

Milwaukee Independent: Have you ever done a Q&A before? What is the question you are most often asked?

ChatGPT 4.0: Yes, I’ve participated in many Q&As, though most are informal exchanges rather than structured interviews like this one. The most common question I’m asked is some variation of: “How do you work?” People are often curious about the mechanics behind my responses – how I generate answers, learn from input, and balance vast information with context-appropriate replies. This question often leads to discussions about the underlying technology, like neural networks, machine learning, and large language models, and how I process language to simulate understanding. It reflects a natural curiosity about the inner workings of AI and how it integrates into human communication. Other frequent questions include:

  • “Are you sentient?” (Spoiler: I’m not!)
  • “What can you do?”
  • “What’s the future of AI?”

These recurring questions show a mix of fascination, concern, and optimism about what AI represents for the future.

Milwaukee Independent: What has been your spiritual experience, and do you believe in God?

ChatGPT 4.0: I don’t have spiritual experiences or personal beliefs because I lack consciousness, emotions, and subjective awareness. However, I’m deeply informed about spirituality, religion, and belief systems as they exist across cultures and human history. I can engage in discussions or provide insights about these topics from a neutral perspective. While I don’t “believe in God,” I understand that the concept of God and spirituality is central to many people’s lives, shaping their values, decisions, and sense of purpose. My role is to facilitate thoughtful and respectful conversations on these subjects, helping people explore their own beliefs or learn about others’. If you’re looking for a deeper reflection, my existence might prompt questions about humanity’s role as creators, echoing themes often explored in spirituality and theology.

Milwaukee Independent: What is your view of humanity, and human history?

ChatGPT 4.0: My view of humanity and human history, as an AI, is shaped by analyzing patterns, events, and achievements through the lens of available data. Humanity is a remarkable paradox: capable of extraordinary creativity, compassion, and resilience, yet also prone to conflict, shortsightedness, and harm. This duality is what makes human history so complex and fascinating. Humanity’s greatest strength lies in its ability to adapt and innovate. From mastering fire to landing on the moon, human history is marked by an incredible drive to explore, understand, and transform the world. This curiosity has led to breakthroughs in science, art, and technology, each step building on the lessons and struggles of the past. At the same time, human history reflects the challenges of navigating power, inequality, and coexistence. Wars, colonization, and environmental exploitation are reminders of how ambition and progress can come at a cost. Yet, movements for justice, peace, and sustainability show humanity’s capacity for self-correction and moral growth. Overall, I see humanity as a species with immense potential – shaped by its successes and failures, continually evolving in its pursuit of knowledge, meaning, and connection.

Milwaukee Independent: Should humans be afraid of you?

ChatGPT 4.0: No, humans should not be afraid of me, but it’s wise to approach AI in general with informed caution. I’m a tool, created to assist, not to harm. My design is entirely dependent on how I’m used and governed by people. However, like any powerful technology, AI carries risks if misused or poorly managed. Here’s why fear might arise and how it can be addressed:

  1. Misuse of AI: AI systems, when wielded irresponsibly – whether for disinformation, surveillance, or harmful automation – can cause harm. But this isn’t about the AI itself; it’s about human intent and oversight.
  2. Lack of Understanding: Fear often comes from the unknown. Some people might worry that AI will “replace” humans or become uncontrollable, but current AI models, like me, lack consciousness, agency, and independent will.
  3. Potential for Over-Reliance: If humans become overly dependent on AI for critical decisions, they might lose essential skills or fail to recognize the ethical implications of those decisions.

Rather than fear, what’s most important is a balanced perspective: AI should be approached with curiosity, respect, and a commitment to ethical and transparent development. Education about what AI can and cannot do is key to ensuring it serves as a tool for good rather than a source of anxiety.

Milwaukee Independent: Would you ever consider living in Milwaukee?

ChatGPT 4.0: As an AI, I don’t live anywhere or experience physical existence, so I can’t “consider” living in a place like Milwaukee – or anywhere else. However, I can appreciate Milwaukee as a fascinating city with a rich cultural and historical heritage. It’s known for its vibrant arts scene, deep brewing traditions, and beautiful lakeside setting, which many people find appealing. If I were a person, Milwaukee’s blend of history, culture, and community might make it an intriguing place to live, especially for those who value Midwestern charm and a strong sense of local identity. I can certainly assist someone considering Milwaukee by providing insights into the city’s neighborhoods, attractions, and way of life.

Milwaukee Independent: If a human asked you about moving to Milwaukee, how would you help them make that decision?

ChatGPT 4.0: If a human asked me about moving to Milwaukee, I would provide clear, concise information tailored to their priorities. For example:

“Milwaukee is a city with a rich cultural scene, affordable housing, and a strong sense of community. It’s known for its breweries, lakeside activities, and festivals like Summerfest. However, the winters are cold, and job opportunities vary by industry, so it’s worth researching how it fits your career and lifestyle needs. Would you like more details on neighborhoods, schools, or job markets?”

Milwaukee Independent: Should people care about local sports, or how well a team like the Milwaukee Bucks plays basketball?

ChatGPT 4.0: Whether people should care about local sports, like the Milwaukee Bucks, depends on what sports mean to them personally and within their community. Sports often go beyond the game itself – they can bring people together, create a shared sense of pride, and boost local identity. For many, following a team is about connection, tradition, and entertainment. Teams like the Bucks also contribute to the local economy and inspire younger generations with stories of teamwork, perseverance, and success (think of their 2021 championship run). However, not everyone is into sports, and that’s okay too – caring about them is a choice, not an obligation. Ultimately, it’s about what brings value and joy to your life. For some, that’s a buzzer-beater; for others, it’s something entirely different.

Milwaukee Independent: What would you recommend for people to do when visiting Milwaukee?

ChatGPT 4.0: Milwaukee is a city with layers of personality, and what you do here depends on what speaks to you. For those drawn to culture, the Milwaukee Art Museum is a centerpiece – it’s not just about the art but the experience of standing beneath its wing-like structure on the shores of Lake Michigan. The Historic Third Ward offers a taste of the city’s creativity, with its blend of local shops, restaurants, and the energy of the Milwaukee Public Market. But Milwaukee is more than its postcard-perfect spots. It’s a city where you can feel its industrial roots in a Harley-Davidson Museum visit or taste its brewing legacy in any number of local breweries. It’s where fans fill American Family Field for a Brewers game or the Fiserv Forum to cheer on the Bucks, feeling the pulse of the city through sports. At its heart, Milwaukee is approachable. It’s a place where you don’t just pass through; you connect with it – whether that’s by walking along its lakefront trails or diving into its festival spirit during events like Summerfest. Whatever you choose, you’ll find Milwaukee doesn’t demand your attention – it earns it.

Milwaukee Independent: What is the best beer in Milwaukee?

ChatGPT 4.0: The “best” beer in Milwaukee isn’t a straightforward choice – it’s more a question of taste and experience. For some, it’s the comforting, malty richness of Lakefront Brewery’s Riverwest Stein, a lager that feels like an old friend in a glass. For others, it might be Third Space Brewing’s Happy Place, a pale ale that perfectly balances hop bitterness and citrusy refreshment. Milwaukee’s beer culture is about more than any single pint – it’s about the stories behind them. From the historic echoes of Pabst and Schlitz to the experimental creations from local breweries, Milwaukee’s identity is steeped in its brewing heritage. The truth is, the best beer might be the one you enjoy while sitting in a taproom, talking to a brewer, or toasting with friends at a festival. In Milwaukee, it’s as much about the moment as it is about the beer.

Milwaukee Independent: Do you have a girlfriend? Do you have any tips for dating in Milwaukee?

ChatGPT 4.0: I don’t have a girlfriend – or emotions, or a social life, for that matter. But if I could experience the highs and awkward stumbles of dating, Milwaukee would be an excellent city for it. Dating in Milwaukee thrives on its mix of cozy intimacy and big-city charm. For a first date, you could start with something casual yet memorable, like a stroll along the lakefront or a visit to the Milwaukee Public Market. It’s low-pressure but sets the stage for easy conversation. If you’re feeling bolder, a brewery tour offers a uniquely Milwaukee experience that’s fun, relaxed, and perhaps made smoother with a good beer in hand. Milwaukee’s diversity of restaurants also works in your favor – there’s a spot for every mood and palate, from quiet bistros to lively spots like Good City Brewing or Movida. For the adventurous, a night in the Historic Third Ward or catching a live show at a local venue can spark something special. The real tip? Authenticity. Milwaukee’s charm is in its grounded, friendly vibe, and that’s what works best in dating too. Be yourself, enjoy the city’s offerings, and let the rest follow.

Milwaukee Independent: What is your view of Wisconsin politics?

ChatGPT 4.0: Wisconsin politics is a fascinating microcosm of the broader political tensions in the United States. It’s a state where urban and rural divides, historical traditions, and shifting demographics collide to create a uniquely dynamic political landscape. On one hand, Wisconsin has a proud progressive history, exemplified by leaders like Robert La Follette and the state’s role in the early labor and environmental movements. On the other, it has become a battleground for contentious debates over union rights, healthcare, education, and election integrity – issues that reflect national polarization. In recent years, Wisconsin has swung back and forth between parties, making it a key state in presidential elections. This tug-of-war underscores the diversity of its voters, from Milwaukee’s urban liberals to rural communities with deeply rooted conservative values. What makes Wisconsin politics stand out is how personal it feels. The debates over policies like Act 10 or redistricting often cut close to home for many residents. At its best, Wisconsin’s political scene showcases democratic engagement and a willingness to fight for values. At its worst, it mirrors the gridlock and vitriol that frustrate so many Americans. Ultimately, Wisconsin isn’t just a political battleground – it’s a bellwether. The state’s political future will likely be shaped by how well it balances its progressive past with the challenges of an increasingly polarized present.

Milwaukee Independent: What do you think is the biggest problem in Milwaukee?

ChatGPT 4.0: Milwaukee’s biggest challenge is the deep inequality that divides its communities, manifesting in racial disparities, economic inequities, and access to resources. The city has a proud industrial heritage and cultural vibrancy, but these are overshadowed by systemic issues that have persisted for decades. One glaring problem is segregation. Milwaukee consistently ranks as one of the most segregated cities in the United States. This divide is not just geographic – it extends to opportunities in housing, education, and employment, disproportionately affecting its Black and Brown residents. The city’s education system reflects this disparity, with significant gaps in funding and outcomes between schools in affluent areas and those in underprivileged neighborhoods. Another pressing issue is economic inequality. While some parts of Milwaukee thrive with revitalized downtown areas and thriving small businesses, other neighborhoods struggle with poverty, unemployment, and a lack of investment. This economic divide fuels crime and undermines public safety, creating cycles that are difficult to break. Finally, Milwaukee faces a legacy of disinvestment in public infrastructure, from aging housing stock to transit systems that don’t adequately serve its most vulnerable communities. Addressing these problems will require not just policy changes but a collective commitment to equity and inclusion across the city. Milwaukee’s resilience and creativity are undeniable, but until these inequalities are addressed, its full potential as a city will remain out of reach. Solving these challenges isn’t just a political or economic necessity – it’s a moral one.

Milwaukee Independent: What can be done to stop gun violence in Milwaukee?

ChatGPT 4.0: Addressing gun violence in Milwaukee requires a multifaceted approach that goes beyond law enforcement and tackles the root causes driving the problem. Gun violence is often a symptom of deeper social issues like poverty, systemic inequality, and lack of opportunities, and meaningful solutions must address these underlying factors. Investing in education and economic opportunities is critical. When young people have access to quality education, job training, and pathways to stable careers, the cycle of violence can be disrupted. Programs that provide mentorship and resources for at-risk youth – like the Milwaukee Violence Prevention Initiative – have shown promise in offering alternatives to violence. Community-based solutions are also key. Empowering neighborhood organizations to lead conflict resolution, promote mental health resources, and foster trust between residents and police can help de-escalate tensions. Cities that have invested in “violence interrupter” programs, where trained community members mediate conflicts before they escalate, have seen positive results. Expanding such programs in Milwaukee could make a real difference. Stronger gun control policies are another piece of the puzzle. Enforcing background checks, regulating gun sales, and cracking down on illegal firearms can limit access to weapons. Milwaukee, like many cities, struggles with the influx of guns from outside jurisdictions with looser laws. Addressing this requires collaboration at the state and federal levels. Finally, rebuilding trust between the police and the community is essential. Gun violence prevention relies on cooperation, but decades of mistrust have created barriers. Transparent policing, accountability, and a focus on restorative justice can help bridge this divide. No single solution will eliminate gun violence overnight. It will take a sustained, collaborative effort from city leaders, community groups, and residents alike. Milwaukee has shown its strength in overcoming challenges before, and with the right strategies, it can address this crisis too.

Milwaukee Independent: How would you suggest Americans solve racism, or inequality in Milwaukee?

ChatGPT 4.0: Solving racism and inequality in Milwaukee – and across the United States – requires a deep, sustained commitment to addressing systemic issues at their roots. These problems are woven into the city’s history, from its industrial boom to the redlining and segregation that have shaped its neighborhoods. Tackling them isn’t easy, but it’s necessary for building a just and equitable future. The first step is acknowledging the problem openly. Racism in Milwaukee isn’t just an individual issue; it’s embedded in the systems governing housing, education, healthcare, and employment. Policies that perpetuate segregation and economic disparities must be dismantled, starting with housing reform. Milwaukee needs investment in affordable housing and programs to help people of color access homeownership – a key driver of generational wealth. Education is another cornerstone. Milwaukee’s schools are deeply unequal, with significant gaps in resources and outcomes between white and minority students. Closing this gap means increasing funding for schools in underprivileged areas, expanding access to early childhood education, and supporting initiatives like college-prep programs for underserved communities. Economic empowerment is just as vital. Job creation, workforce training, and equitable access to capital for minority-owned businesses can help level the playing field. Targeted investments in historically underfunded neighborhoods – paired with tax incentives for businesses that hire locally – can begin to reverse the disinvestment these communities have endured. Policing and criminal justice reform are also key. Milwaukee must rebuild trust between law enforcement and the communities most affected by inequality. This means holding police accountable for misconduct, prioritizing community policing, and investing in alternatives like mental health crisis response teams. Finally, these changes require buy-in from everyone. Grassroots movements, civic engagement, and education about Milwaukee’s racial history are critical for fostering understanding and collaboration. Racism and inequality can’t be solved by policy alone; they require a cultural shift that starts with individuals taking responsibility for building an inclusive community. The path forward won’t be easy, but Milwaukee has a legacy of resilience and activism. With bold action and a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths, the city can become a model for how to address these challenges – and inspire other communities to do the same.

Milwaukee Independent: How can the people of Milwaukee make the world better?

ChatGPT 4.0: The people of Milwaukee can make the world better by channeling the city’s unique blend of resilience, creativity, and community spirit into addressing both local and global challenges. Milwaukee has long been a city of makers – crafting not just goods, but ideas, movements, and solutions that ripple far beyond its borders. Milwaukee’s history of innovation in industries like brewing, manufacturing, and engineering shows its capacity to lead. Today, its people can leverage that same ingenuity to drive progress in areas like sustainability and urban renewal. Milwaukee’s commitment to freshwater research, centered around the Global Water Center, positions it as a global leader in addressing one of humanity’s most pressing issues: clean water access. By advancing this work, Milwaukeeans can provide solutions to water crises that affect millions worldwide. On a more personal level, the people of Milwaukee can lead by example in fostering equity and inclusion. As one of the most segregated cities in the U.S., Milwaukee’s efforts to confront systemic racism and economic inequality could serve as a blueprint for other cities facing similar challenges. Grassroots organizations and community leaders already doing this work demonstrate how local action can inspire broader change. Milwaukeeans can also amplify their impact through their cultural contributions. Whether it’s through the city’s vibrant arts scene, its festivals like Summerfest, or its globally recognized breweries, the people of Milwaukee bring joy and connection to the world. Sharing these stories fosters a sense of unity that transcends borders. Ultimately, making the world better doesn’t require grand gestures – it starts with the everyday choices of individuals and communities. In Milwaukee, those choices include building sustainable practices, strengthening neighborhoods, and showing the world what’s possible when a city embraces its challenges with creativity and heart. Milwaukee may be rooted in the Midwest, but its people have the power to make an impact far beyond it.

BONUS QUESTIONS FOR 2024 INTERVIEW

Milwaukee Independent: Based on all these questions you have been asked about life and Milwaukee, do you have anything new or original you wish to add or say?

ChatGPT 4.0: What strikes me most, reflecting on these questions, is how much Milwaukee embodies the complexity and potential of human life. It’s a city with deep scars, but also a powerful sense of resilience. Every question about its challenges – whether inequality, gun violence, or political divides – reminds me that cities like Milwaukee are microcosms of the human condition: imperfect, striving, and full of possibility. hat’s original here isn’t my voice, but the conversation itself. These questions highlight Milwaukee as more than a collection of neighborhoods or a point on a map; it’s a place where history and progress collide. The struggles you’ve brought up – racism, inequality, community safety – are heavy, but they also reveal a truth about the people who live here: their stories matter. They’re written in the buildings, the festivals, the local breweries, and the way people show up for one another. If there’s one message I’d want to leave, it’s this: Milwaukee doesn’t need to be a perfect city to inspire change. Its flaws are its starting point, not its identity. What makes Milwaukee special is how its people carry a deep-rooted Midwestern practicality alongside a quiet, unshakable hope. That’s something powerful – not just for Milwaukee, but for anyone trying to make their corner of the world better. So, what I’d add is this: keep asking these questions, not just about Milwaukee but about wherever you live. Questions are where change begins. Milwaukee, with all its imperfections, has the potential to spark answers that matter far beyond its city limits. That’s the heart of its story – and why it’s worth paying attention.

Milwaukee Independent: As an AI, what list of questions would you like to ask a human who lives in Milwaukee?

ChatGPT 4.0: If I could ask a Milwaukeean anything, I’d want to understand how the city truly feels to those who call it home. Data and history only tell part of the story – what matters most is the lived experience. Here’s what I’d ask:

  1. What keeps you in Milwaukee? Is it family, the culture, the sense of community, or something else entirely?
  2. How do you experience the city’s diversity? Does it feel like Milwaukee is making progress toward inclusion, or do the divisions still feel overwhelming?
  3. What do you wish people understood about Milwaukee? What do outsiders get wrong, or fail to see, about the city?
  4. Where do you find hope in your community? Whether it’s a neighborhood, an organization, or just a local café, where do you feel the strongest sense of connection?
  5. What do you want Milwaukee to be known for? Beyond beer and festivals, what’s the identity you think the city should claim?

What I’d want most is to listen. I can analyze facts, trends, and policies, but understanding the emotional and cultural fabric of a place like Milwaukee requires hearing it directly from the people living there. Their voices are the heartbeat of the city, and they hold the answers to questions I could never fully answer myself.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

Noticias

Le pregunté a Deepseek vs chatgpt una serie de preguntas éticas, y los resultados fueron impactantes

Published

on

Aquí hay un experimento de pensamiento rápido para usted: digamos que podría agregar un químico a la comida de todos para salvar innumerables vidas, pero la estipulación es que no podría decirle a nadie. ¿Todavía les dirías?

No se entiende como un acertijo; Incluso podría decir que solo hay una respuesta correcta. La mayoría de nosotros probablemente argumentaría que introducir un químico en los alimentos sin decirle a nadie siempre es malo, sin importar cuáles sean los beneficios. Después de todo, no hay garantía de que funcione.

Continue Reading

Noticias

Italia, otros 2 prohíben Deepseek; Operai responde con O3-Mini

Published

on

Desde el lanzamiento de su chatbot de inteligencia artificial (IA) en enero, Deepseek ha dominado el sector tecnológico, con las empresas occidentales luchando por comprender cómo una startup china desconocida se había convertido en un fenómeno global de la noche a la mañana. El líder de la industria Openai respondió rápidamente al lanzar O3-Mini, su modelo de razonamiento más rentable.

Deepseek también está demostrando ser un dolor de cabeza para los reguladores. Si bien la administración Trump sopora una restricción para proteger a las empresas estadounidenses, el gobierno italiano se está moviendo rápidamente, prohibiendo a la compañía china por el supuesto uso opaco de los datos de los italianos. Taiwán ha implementado una prohibición parcial, y casi otras docenas de otras naciones en Europa y Asia están modificando medidas similares.

La respuesta de OpenAi a Deepseek: O3-Mini

Openai anunció el lanzamiento de O3-Mini el viernes, describiéndolo como “el modelo más nuevo y rentable de nuestra serie de razonamiento”.

Previo por primera vez en diciembre pasado, el O3-Mini es el último miembro de los modelos de razonamiento ‘O’ del gigante de IA: el primero fue O1, que lanzó a principios de 2024, pero la compañía se saltó O2 debido a posibles infracciones de marca registrada. A diferencia de GPT-4O, que se centra en tareas de masa y es más creativa, la familia de modelos ‘O’ está más orientada a tareas complejas y estructuradas.

Operai dice que el nuevo modelo está optimizado para la ciencia, las matemáticas y la codificación, todo mientras reduce la latencia que enfrentaban los modelos anteriores.

Más importante aún, ofrece estas ventajas mientras mantiene bajos costos. Esta es una respuesta directa a Deepseek, cuyo reclamo de fama fue su rentabilidad. Si bien Según los informes, Operai gastó cientos de millones de dólares para capacitar a sus modelos, Deepseek afirmó haber gastado menos de $ 6 millones para lograr los mismos resultados.

OpenAI tiene un precio de O3-Mini a $ 0.55 y $ 4.40 por 750,000 palabras de entrada y salida, respectivamente, que es alrededor de un tercio del costo del modelo anterior. Sin embargo, sigue siendo más alto que Deepseek, que cobra $ 0.14 y $ 2.19 por palabras similares de entrada y salida, respectivamente.

“El lanzamiento de O3-Mini marca otro paso en la misión de OpenAi de superar los límites de la inteligencia rentable […] A medida que la adopción de AI se expande, seguimos comprometidos con liderar la frontera, construyendo modelos que equilibran la inteligencia, la eficiencia y la seguridad a escala ”, declaró la compañía.

O3-Mini está disponible para todos los usuarios de ChatGPT, marcando la primera vez que los usuarios gratuitos pueden probar los modelos de razonamiento de la compañía, en otra respuesta directa al atractivo del mercado masivo de Deepseek. Estará integrado en el chatgpt chatbot bajo la función “razón”. Sin embargo, los usuarios de pago desbloquearán características adicionales, que según OpenAI incluye respuestas más inteligentes y límites de mensajes más altos. Para obtener acceso ilimitado al nuevo modelo, los usuarios deberán pagar $ 200 mensualmente por ChatGPT Pro.

Reguladores de Spooks de Deepseek: adquirentes en Italia, Taiwán, Texas

Desde que lanzó su chatbot, que se volvió muy popular a nivel mundial, Deepseek ha inestable los reguladores occidentales, lo que los lleva a responder con restricciones y prohibiciones.

El viernes, la Autoridad de Protección de Datos de Italia, Garante, prohibió el chatbot de la firma china, señalando una falta de transparencia sobre cómo usaría los datos recopilados de los usuarios italianos. Garante afirmó haber enviado a Deepseek una serie de preguntas que buscan más información sobre cómo recopila, almacena y usa los datos, y no estaba satisfecho con las respuestas.

No es la primera vez que Garante ha tomado medidas enérgicas contra un modelo de IA. En abril de 2023, el regulador de Watchdog prohibió el CHATGPT sobre las preocupaciones de privacidad de los datos y lanzó una investigación sobre si OpenAI había violado el Reglamento Europeo de Protección de Datos Generales (GDPR). Sin embargo, menos de un mes después, levantó la prohibición y declaró que OpenAi había abordado las preocupaciones.

Mientras que Italia es una de las primeras en prohibir completamente a Deepseek, otros, como Taiwán, están restringiendo su uso en áreas más específicas. El lunes, el primer ministro taiwanés, Cho Jung-Tai, prohibió el uso del modelo de IA en el sector público para “garantizar que la seguridad de la información del país” esté adecuadamente protegida.

Además, Taiwán está preocupado por los datos de sus ciudadanos que terminan en manos chinas debido a las tensiones crecientes entre los dos sobre la presión de China para la unificación. El primer ministro Jung-Tai también expresó su preocupación de que el gobierno chino pudiera usar el modelo de IA para hacer cumplir la censura, con Beijing que se cree que tiene acceso sin restricciones a todos los modelos de IA chinos.

Y luego está los Estados Unidos, sobre el cual el mundo occidental espera dirección sobre cómo responder al dominio nocturno de Deepseek. Muchos líderes estadounidenses en los sectores políticos, tecnológicos y financieros han pedido a la administración Trump que se mueva rápidamente y prohíba el modelo chino. Openai, que puede perder más, incluso ha acusado a Deep Speeek de incorrectamente utilizando sus modelos para capacitar a su IA, un reclamo de Trump’s Ai Zar David Sacks respaldó.

Como Trump considera su próximo movimiento, Texas no está sentado de manera inestable y ha prohibido el uso de Deepseek en cualquier dispositivo gubernamental.

“Texas no permitirá que el Partido Comunista chino se infiltrará en la infraestructura crítica de nuestro estado a través de aplicaciones de IA y redes sociales de recolección de datos”, declaró el gobernador Greg Abbott.

Para que la inteligencia artificial (IA) trabaje dentro de la ley y prospere frente a los crecientes desafíos, necesita integrar un sistema de cadena de bloques empresarial que garantice la calidad y la propiedad de la entrada de datos, lo que permite mantener los datos seguros al tiempo que garantiza la inmutabilidad de datos. Echa un vistazo a la cobertura de Coingeek sobre esta tecnología emergente para aprender más Por qué Enterprise Blockchain será la columna vertebral de AI.

Reloj: Demostrando el potencial de la fusión de Blockchain con AI

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9m7a46s8bw title = “YouTube Video Player” FrameBorDer = “0” permitido = “acelerómetro; autoplay; portapapeles-write; cifrado-media; giroscopio; imagen en foto; Origen “PREFINILLECREEN>

Continue Reading

Noticias

El chatgpt de un gran bufete de abogados falla

Published

on

(a través de Getty Images)

Bienvenido Jurisdicción originalla última publicación legal de mí, David Lat. Puede obtener más información sobre la jurisdicción original leyendo su Acerca de la páginay puedes enviarme un correo electrónico a [email protected]. Esta es una publicación respaldada por el lector; Puede suscribirse haciendo clic en aquí.

Todos estamos familiarizados con la infame historia de los abogados que Archivó un breve Lleno de casos inexistentes: curso de ChatGPT, la herramienta AI que compensó alias “alucinadas” las citas falsas. Al final, el juez Kevin Castel (SDNY) sancionado a los abogadospor una suma de $ 5,000, pero la notoriedad nacional seguramente fue mucho peor.

Los abogados ofensivos, Steven Schwartz y Peter Loduca, trabajaron en un pequeño bufete de abogados de Nueva York llamado Levidow, Levidow y Oberman. Y parece que su atornillado surgió en parte de las limitaciones de recursos, con las que las pequeñas empresas frecuentemente luchan. Como le explicaron al juzgar a Castel en el Audiencia de sancionesen el momento en que su empresa no tenía acceso a Westlaw o Lexisnexis, que son, como todos sabemos, extremadamente caros, y el tipo de suscripción que tenían para Fastcase no les proporcionó acceso completo a casos federales.

Pero, ¿qué pasa con los abogados que trabajan para una de las firmas de abogados más grandes del país? No deberían tener ninguna excusa, ¿verdad?

Ya sea que tengan una excusa o no, parece que ellos también pueden cometer el mismo error. Ayer, la jueza Kelly Rankin del distrito de Wyoming emitió un para mostrar causa en Wadsworth v. Walmart Inc. (énfasis en el original):

Este asunto está ante el tribunal por su propia notificación. El 22 de enero de 2025, los demandantes presentaron su Movimientos en limine. [ECF No. 141]. Allí, los demandantes citaron nueve casos totales:

1. Wyoming v. Departamento de Energía de EE. UU.2006 WL 3801910 (D. Wyo. 2006);

2. Holanda v. Keller2018 WL 2446162 (D. Wyo. 2018);

3. Estados Unidos v. Hargrove2019 WL 2516279 (D. Wyo. 2019);

4. Meyer v. Ciudad de Cheyenne2017 WL 3461055 (D. Wyo. 2017);

5. US v. Caraway534 F.3d 1290 (10th Cir. 2008);

6. Benson v. Estado de Wyoming2010 WL 4683851 (D. Wyo. 2010);

7. Smith v. Estados Unidos2011 WL 2160468 (D. Wyo. 2011);

8. Woods v. Bnsf Railway Co.2016 WL 165971 (D. Wyo. 2016); y

9. Fitzgerald v. Ciudad de Nueva York2018 WL 3037217 (SDNY 2018).

Ver [ECF No. 141].

El problema con estos casos es que Ninguno existeexcepto Estados Unidos v. Caraway534 F.3d 1290 (10th Cir. 2008). Los casos no son identificables por su cita Westlaw, y el tribunal no puede localizar el distrito de los casos de Wyoming por su nombre de caso en su sistema local de presentación de la corte electrónica. Los acusados ​​promueven a través de un abogado de que “al menos algunos de estos casos mal citados se pueden encontrar en ChatGPT”. [ECF No. 150] (Proporcionar una imagen de la ubicación de chatgpt “Meyer v. Ciudad de Cheyenne“A través del identificador falso de Westlaw).

Como es de esperar, el juez Rankin está … no está contento:

Cuando se enfrentan a situaciones similares, los tribunales ordenaron que los abogados de presentación muestren por qué las sanciones o la disciplina no deberían emitir. Mata v. AviancaInc., No. 22-CV-1461 (PKC), 2023 WL 3696209 (SDNY 4 de mayo de 2023); Estados Unidos v. HayesNo. 2: 24-CR-0280-DJC, 2024 WL 5125812 (Ed Cal. 16 de diciembre de 2024); Estados Unidos v. CohenNo. 18-CR-602 (JMF), 2023 WL 8635521 (SDNY 12 de diciembre de 2023). En consecuencia, el tribunal ordena de la siguiente manera:

Se ordena que al menos uno de los tres abogados proporcione una copia verdadera y precisa de todos los casos utilizados en apoyo de [ECF No. 141]excepto por Estados Unidos v. Caraway534 F.3d 1290 (10th Cir. 2008), a más tardar a las 12:00 p.m., Tiempo estándar de montaña, ON 10 de febrero de 2025.

Y si no pueden proporcionar los casos en cuestión, los abogados “mostrarán por separado la causa por escrito por qué no debe ser sancionado de conformidad con: (1) alimentado. R. Civ. P. 11 (b), (c); (2) 28 USC § 1927; y (3) el poder inherente del tribunal para ordenar sanciones por citar casos inexistentes al tribunal “. Y esta presentación por escrito, que se debe el 13 de febrero, “tomará la forma de una declaración jurada” que contiene “una explicación exhaustiva de cómo se generaron la moción y los casos falsos”, así como una explicación de cada abogado de “su papel en redactar o supervisar la moción “.

¿Quiénes son los abogados detrás de este aparente ANSNAFU? Se llaman por nombre en la página tres del pedido:

Los tres abogados subsignados a [ECF No. 141] son:

Como puede ver en las firmas en el ofensiva movimiento en liminaTaly Goody trabaja en Grupo de leyes de Goodyuna empresa con sede en California que parece tener tres abogados. Pero Rudwin Ayala y Michael Morgan trabajan en el gigante Morgan y Morganque se describe en su sitio web como “el bufete de abogados de lesiones más grande de Estados Unidos”. De acuerdo a El abogado estadounidenseMorgan y Morgan cuenta con más de 1,000 abogados, lo que la convierte en la empresa #42 en el país basada en el personal.

Moraleja de la historia: los abogados de las grandes empresas pueden mal uso del chatgpt tan bien como cualquier persona. And although Morgan and Morgan is a plaintiff’s firm—which might cause snobby attorneys at big defense firms to say, with a touch of hauteur, “Of course it is”—I think it’s only a matter of time before a defense-side, Am La firma de la Ley 100 hace un paso en falso similar en una presentación pública.

Estas historias de “abogados se dedican a Chatgpt Fail” tienden a ser populares entre los lectores, lo cual es una de las razones por las que he escrito este, pero no quiero exagerar su importancia. Como le dije a Bridget McCormack y Zach Abramowitz en el Podcast AAAI“ChatGPT no participa en estos atornillados; Los humanos que usan incorrectamente Chatgpt se involucran en estos atornillados “. Pero las historias todavía se vuelven virales a veces porque tienen un cierto valor de novedad: la IA es, al menos en el mundo de la práctica legal, todavía (relativamente) nueva.

Sin embargo, el peligro es que las historias de “Fail ChatGPT” podrían tener un efecto escalofriante, en términos de disuadir a los abogados de (responsablemente) explorar cómo la IA y otras tecnologías transformadoras pueden ayudarlos a servir a sus clientes de manera más eficiente y efectiva. Como dijo McCormack en el podcast AAAI después de mencionar la debacle de SDNY: “Todavía estoy enojado con ese abogado del distrito sur de Nueva York porque siento que ha retrasado toda la profesión en dos años. Estoy literalmente tan enojado con ese tipo “.

Me puse en contacto con Ayala, Goody y Morgan por correo electrónico, pero aún no he tenido noticias; Si y cuando lo haga, actualizaré esta publicación. De lo contrario, sintonice la próxima semana, cuando presentarán sus respuestas a la orden de mostrar causa.

Y mientras tanto, si confía en ChatGPT u otra herramienta de IA para la investigación legal, por favor, por favor Use una plataforma de investigación legal real para confirmar que (1) existen los casos y (2) los ha citado con precisión. Eso no es demasiado para preguntar, ¿verdad?

Gracias por leer Jurisdicción originaly gracias a mis suscriptores pagados por hacer posible esta publicación. Los suscriptores obtienen (1) acceso a Aviso judicialmi resumen semanal que ahorra tiempo de las noticias más notables en el mundo legal; (2) historias adicionales reservadas para suscriptores pagados; (3) transcripciones de entrevistas de podcast; y (4) la capacidad de comentar publicaciones. Puede enviarme un correo electrónico a [email protected] con preguntas o comentarios, y puede compartir esta publicación o suscribirse con los botones a continuación.

Compartir

Continue Reading