I’ve been off X (formerly Twitter) for so long that I completely missed some of its latest developments, including its AI chatbot, Grok. Created by xAI, Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence venture, Grok is built on its own large language model (LLM) and was launched in 2023 as a challenger to mainstream AI assistants.

When I first heard about Grok 3, the latest iteration, I was immediately curious. 

Could this AI go head-to-head with ChatGPT and Google Gemini? 

Was it just another gimmick tied to X, or was there real potential here? 

To find out, I did what any AI enthusiast would do, I ditched ChatGPT and Gemini for an entire week and used Grok 3 exclusively.

In this review, I’ll take you through my hands-on experience, covering everything from usability and response quality to speed, customization, and overall performance. If you’re wondering whether Grok 3 is worth your time, stick around as I’m about to give you my unfiltered verdict.

TL;DR: Key takeaways from this article

• Grok 3 is fast, witty, and built for engagement, excelling in humor and casual conversations while holding its own in content generation.
• It’s exclusive to X (formerly Twitter), bundled with X Premium+ at $40/month, with a standalone SuperGrok plan at $30/month or $300/year. There’s a temporary free access period (until the server capacity is exceeded). 
• Speed is impressive, rivaling ChatGPT and Gemini, but factual accuracy is hit-or-miss, making it less reliable for research.
• It’s best for casual users and developers looking for an API, but researchers and businesses may prefer ChatGPT or Gemini.

Understanding Grok 3?

What is Grok 3? 

Grok 3 is the latest iteration of xAI’s artificial intelligence model, designed to handle a wide range of queries with enhanced reasoning, real-time knowledge, and deep contextual understanding. 

Unlike some traditional AI assistants with static knowledge cutoffs, Grok 3 stays up-to-date by analyzing information from the web and X (formerly Twitter), making it particularly useful for real-time insights. What sets Grok 3 apart is its ability to interact with X content, including user profiles, posts, linked articles, and even uploaded files like images or PDFs.

It also comes with three distinct operating modes: Think Mode, Big Brain Mode, and DeepSearch Mode. 

How does Grok 3 work? 

At its core, Grok 3 operates using a large language model (LLM) trained to understand and generate human-like responses. 

Here’s a simplified breakdown of how it functions:

1. Query processing: When you input a question or command, Grok 3 first analyzes the context and intent behind your request.
2. Real-time knowledge retrieval: It searches X, the broader web, or internal training data for the most relevant information.
3. Reasoning and response generation: Based on the query, Grok 3 selects the best mode (Think, Big Brain, or DeepSearch) to craft a response with the appropriate depth.
4. Multi-modal capabilities: If needed, it can process images, analyze uploaded documents, or generate new visuals upon request.
5. Output refinement: Users can tweak responses, ask for revisions, or request deeper insights to refine the final answer.

Grok 3 at a glance

Why I decided to use Grok 3 for one instead of ChatGPT and Google Gemini

As someone who regularly relies on AI for everything from content creation to research, I wanted to see if Grok 3 could genuinely compete with ChatGPT and Google Gemini — two of the most established AI models today.

I had a few key questions in mind:

• Is Grok 3 a viable alternative to ChatGPT and Gemini?
• How does it handle complex queries, coding, and content generation?
• Can it offer anything unique that ChatGPT and Gemini don’t?
• Would I want to use Grok 3 long-term?

Would Grok 3 impress me or leave me scrambling back to my AI comfort zone? 

Let’s find out.

Getting started with Grok 3 (vs. ChatGPT and Gemini)

Sign-up and onboarding experience

Setting up Grok 3 was a seamless process but with a catch. Unlike ChatGPT, which allows standalone sign-ups, Grok 3 requires an X (formerly Twitter) account, much like the way Gemini requires a Google account and Meta AI runs on Facebook, Instagram, or WhatsApp account (although it also has a standalone platform). While this integration is convenient for existing X users, it could be a dealbreaker for those who prefer independent access.

The onboarding experience was straightforward. After logging in, I was given a brief but effective walkthrough of Grok 3’s capabilities. Compared to Gemini’s onboarding, which focuses on Google services integration, and ChatGPT’s optional customization settings, Grok 3 took a more direct approach, no frills, just a quick introduction before diving in.

How easy is it to use Grok 3? 

From the moment I started interacting with Grok 3, I found the usability to be a balance between simplicity and power. The AI responded quickly, and switching between modes was effortless. 

However, one immediate limitation stood out, there were fewer customization options than I expected. Unlike ChatGPT, which lets you adjust conversation memory settings, or Gemini, which integrates Google tools for more tailored results, Grok 3 felt a bit more rigid in its setup.

First impressions: interface and usability

At first glance, Grok 3’s interface felt like a mix of ChatGPT’s structured chat layout and Gemini’s Google-integrated workspace. It was minimalistic, clean, and responsive, making navigation smooth. Unlike Gemini, which spreads its functionality across different Google services, Grok 3 kept everything centralized, which I appreciated. For those who prioritize speed and ease of use, Grok 3’s no-nonsense layout and snappy performance were definite pluses.

Grok 3 key features and performance (vs. ChatGPT and Google Gemini)

1. AI capabilities: creativity, accuracy, and problem-solving

I subjected Grok 3 to a rigorous testing criteria across diverse tasks that ranged from creative writing to technical problem-solving:

I. Content generation: When I asked Grok 3 to draft articles and creative stories, its personality immediately stood out. Unlike the sometimes sterile outputs from other AI systems, Grok’s responses sparkled with wit and humor. While brainstorming marketing concepts for a fictional coffee shop, it suggested campaign ideas that genuinely made me laugh, something neither ChatGPT nor Gemini consistently achieve.

II. Code assistance: Debugging a troublesome Python script (I enlisted the help of a coder) revealed Grok 3’s technical competence. It not only identified the issues in the code, but offered explanations that reflected genuine understanding rather than pattern-matching. Still, when it was presented with a particularly complex algorithm challenge, it occasionally missed nuances that ChatGPT-4 caught.

III. General knowledge and research: For factual questions, Grok 3 delivered solid answers, though with interesting quirks. When I asked about historical events, scientific concepts, and geographic information, its responses were typically accurate but sometimes lacked the encyclopedic depth of its competitors.

Performance breakdown:

I ranked its performance using three criteria:

Creativity: Grok 3 genuinely surprised me with its ability to generate humorous, witty, and occasionally irreverent content. Its personality shines through in ways that feel distinctly different from other AI assistants. While ChatGPT still produced more structurally sophisticated creative writing, Grok’s responses had a spark of originality that often felt more human.

Accuracy: On technical queries, Grok 3 generally performed admirably, though I noticed it occasionally stumbled when compared to Gemini’s precision, particularly when facts required up-to-the-minute accuracy. When I asked about specialized topics in physics and computer science, its answers were solid but sometimes lacked Gemini’s authoritative confidence.

Problem-solving: For complex reasoning tasks, Grok 3 demonstrated impressive capabilities but revealed limitations when tackling truly challenging problems. During a series of logic puzzles, it sometimes failed to match ChatGPT-4’s methodical approach to breaking down multi-step problems.

2. Speed and responsiveness

Waiting too long for an AI response can disrupt your workflow. This aspect of Grok 3 revealed both strengths and surprising limitations.

Grok 3’s response time impressed me across most standard interactions. For straightforward questions and content generation, it frequently matched or even outpaced ChatGPT, delivering snappy replies that kept conversations flowing naturally. This responsiveness made it particularly enjoyable for brainstorming sessions, where rapid ideation matters.

However, Grok 3’s speed advantage disappeared when activating its specialized modes. In particular, DeepSearch mode, while extremely useful for gathering current information, introduced noticeable delays compared to Gemini’s lightning-fast search capabilities. When researching breaking news about a tech conference, Gemini consistently delivered results several seconds faster thanks to its seamless Google integration.

The most dramatic speed difference emerged when using Grok’s Think mode for complex reasoning tasks. Grok took more time to process its response, significantly longer than ChatGPT’s turnaround for the same query. While this extra processing yielded more transparent reasoning, the wait became noticeable enough to disrupt my thought process.

For daily use, these speed differences matter most when you’re under time pressure. If you need rapid-fire responses for simple tasks, Grok generally delivers. But for anything requiring its advanced capabilities, be prepared for occasional waiting periods that can interrupt your workflow.

3. Integration and customization

Grok 3’s approach to integration reveals both forward-thinking features and notable gaps in the ecosystem.

For developers, Grok 3 offers robust API access that enabled me to experiment with integrating its capabilities into custom applications. The documentation proved surprisingly comprehensive, and the implementation process was straightforward compared to my previous experiences with other AI APIs.

However, Grok 3’s third-party integration options pale in comparison to its competitors. While ChatGPT’s extensive plugin ecosystem allows seamless connections to hundreds of tools and services, and Gemini’s deep Google Workspace integration provides natural productivity enhancements, Grok feels noticeably isolated. During my testing week, this limitation became increasingly apparent as I missed my usual seamless transitions between AI assistance and my productivity tools.

Customization options also revealed mixed results. Grok 3 allows basic personality adjustments, but lacks the granular control offered by ChatGPT’s settings and system message customizations. When I attempted to fine-tune Grok’s responses for a technical writing project, I found myself missing the precise calibration that ChatGPT offers through its advanced prompt engineering options.

4. Real-time data access

If you’ve ever tried getting fresh information from an AI, you know the struggle. Ask a chatbot about today’s stock market shifts, and half the time, it’ll shrug like, “I don’t have real-time data.” 

Grok 3? Different story.

Grok 3 is built for live data. Not just browsing the web; it actively pulls updates from X and even digs deeper with DeepSearch Mode, which doesn’t just skim headlines but pulls nuanced details from recent sources.

ChatGPT has web browsing, but it’s not as aggressive with real-time updates. It’s more of a well-organized research assistant than a breaking-news reporter. You’ll get useful context but not always the most up-to-date scoop.

Gemini leans on Google Search, which sounds promising, but in my experience, it wasn’t as fast or as focused on live updates as Grok 3. It’s powerful, but you’re still dealing with a search engine mindset rather than live data integration

5. Specialized modes

One thing I loved about Grok 3 is that it doesn’t just answer; it shifts gears based on the complexity of your question.

Grok 3 has three modes: 

• DeepSearch Mode digs into web and X posts, not just surface-level info. Great for research-heavy topics.
• For Think Mode, instead of spitting out a rushed answer, Grok thinks step by step, like a detective laying out clues.  
• Big Brain Mode taps into a massive GPU cluster (200,000 Nvidia GPUs) to crunch complex data, making it a powerhouse for technical fields like coding and math-heavy analysis.

ChatGPT comes with two modes primarily: Search and Reason. 

• Search Mode (Bing-powered browsing) works fine, but doesn’t feel as tightly integrated as Grok 3’s X-driven updates.
• In Reason Mode, Instead of explaining its reasoning out loud like Grok, ChatGPT works silently in the background. It solved the trolley problem in just 6 seconds, faster but less transparent.

Google Gemini doesn’t exactly have “modes” like Grok or ChatGPT, but it’s a beast at handling multiple formats (text, images, charts). If you throw in a messy spreadsheet, a handwritten note, and a question all at once, Gemini handles it better than the other two.

6. Use cases

No AI is perfect at everything. Here’s where each one truly excels:

Grok 3 dominates when

• You need real-time info (breaking news, stock market trends, latest social discussions).
• You’re doing deep technical research (math, coding, AI problem-solving).
• You want AI that explains its reasoning step-by-step instead of just giving you an answer.

Go for ChatGPT if:

• You need a creative assistant (writing blogs, ad copy, brainstorming ideas).
• You’re working with AI-generated art (DALL·E 3 integration makes ChatGPT the choice for images).
• You want fast, structured answers without too much thinking out loud.

Google Gemini is your best bet when: 

• You need AI that works seamlessly with Google Search, Drive, and Docs.
• You’re handling multiple content types (text, images, and spreadsheets ) in one query.
• You want an AI that’s great for research and summarizing academic content.

7. pricing 

Grok 3 pricing (as of March 11, 2025)

ChatGPT pricing

Google Gemini pricing

Grok 3 comparison with ChatGPT and Gemini

comparison across key features:

My hands-on testing experience

To truly see what Grok 3 was capable of, I put it through real-world tests, the kind of scenarios where I’d normally rely on ChatGPT or Gemini. 

How I tested it

1. Casual conversations and humor test

I threw sarcastic jokes, pop culture references, and absurd hypotheticals at Grok 3 to see if it could match ChatGPT’s wit or Gemini’s polished responses.

Result: Grok 3 nailed humor but sometimes leaned too heavily on snark.

2. Real-time information retrieval

I asked it to summarize breaking news and track trending topics on X.

Result: Impressively fast for X-related topics but sometimes struggled with broader web-based news.

3. Content generation (articles, summaries, and emails)

I tested Grok 3’s ability to write an article, summarize documents, and draft professional emails.

Result: Decent, but lacked the structure and refinement of ChatGPT; it’s better suited for casual writing than professional content.

4. Coding and developer support

I asked Grok 3 to debug code snippets and generate API documentation.

Result: Good, but not as detailed as ChatGPT. ChatGPT provided better explanations and cleaner code suggestions.

5. Image generation and editing

I requested it to generate images and edit existing ones.

Result: It worked, but with limitations. Grok 3 lacked the creative flexibility of DALL·E (ChatGPT) or Gemini’s AI-powered image tools. Editing is limited to images it creates. 

What I liked about Grok 3

1. Humorous and witty responses: If you want an AI with personality and sarcasm, Grok 3 delivers. It’s more fun and engaging compared to ChatGPT’s neutral tone and Gemini’s sometimes dry responses.
2. Fast performance: Grok 3 keeps up with ChatGPT and Gemini in terms of speed, delivering near-instant responses in most cases.
3. Smooth UI experience: The interface is clean and responsive, making it easy to navigate and use for quick queries.
4. API support for developers: While not as robust as OpenAI’s API, Grok 3 does offer integration options for those looking to build apps around it.

Areas for Improvement

1. Factual accuracy needs refinement: While Grok 3 pulls in real-time data, it sometimes misinterprets or misrepresents facts, requiring extra verification.
2. Limited integrations: Unlike ChatGPT’s plugin ecosystem or Gemini’s deep Google integration, Grok 3 is mostly confined to X—which limits its versatility.
3. Customization options could be better: Unlike ChatGPT’s fine-tuning capabilities, Grok 3 offers fewer ways to tweak responses to match your preferred style or depth.

How to get the most out of Grok 3

Grok 3 is powerful, but unlocking its full potential requires knowing how to work with it. 

Here’s how to make it smarter, faster, and more useful for your needs:

1. Use the right mode for the right task

Grok 3 comes with three distinct modes, and choosing the right one dramatically improves results. 

Think Mode is best for complex reasoning, brainstorming, and detailed problem-solving. If you need structured explanations, this is the mode to use.

Big Brain Mode is ideal for intense data processing, deep analysis, or research-heavy tasks. It’s great for coding, financial analysis, and technical reports.

DeepSearch Mode is great for tracking real-time trends, news, and social media discussions (especially on X). Perfect for staying updated on current events.

2. Fine-tune prompts for better results

Like any AI, Grok 3 performs better when given clear, detailed prompts.

For example, don’t just write “Summarize this article.” instead, write “Summarize this article in three bullet points, focusing on key takeaways for a business audience.”

The more specific you are, the better Grok 3 understands your intent.

3. Use real-time data for market insights

Unlike ChatGPT and Gemini, Grok 3 is deeply integrated with X, making it great for:

• Tracking trending topics (great for journalists and marketers). 
• Stock market and crypto updates (perfect for investors).
• Industry news in real time (useful for staying ahead in business).

3. Use it for content and creativity

Grok 3’s humorous and casual tone makes it perfect for content creation, but you need to guide it properly.

If you want a blog post, ask for a draft in a specific style. For example, “Write a tech article in a casual tone like a blog post on The Verge.” If you need engaging tweets, tell it to keep it under 280 characters and use humor.

5. Pair it with other AI tools

While Grok 3 is impressive, it has limitations. Pairing it with other AI tools fills the gaps. 

Use Gemini’s Google integration alongside Grok 3’s DeepSearch for deep research. For better image generation, use ChatGPT’s DALL·E 3 instead of Grok 3’s basic image output. ChatGPT also performs better with debugging and structured code explanations.

Who should use Grok 3?

Grok 3 isn’t for everyone, but it shines in specific scenarios. If you fall into any of these categories, you’ll likely get the most out of it:

1. Casual users who want a fun AI

Grok 3 has a witty and conversational tone, making it great for casual chats, brainstorming ideas, or just having fun. If you’re looking for an AI that feels more like a sarcastic friend than a robotic assistant, Grok 3 is a solid choice.

2. Developers integrating AI into their apps

With API access, Grok 3 can be integrated into apps, offering real-time insights, automated responses, or conversational AI features. If you’re a developer looking for an alternative to OpenAI’s API, Grok 3’s ecosystem could be worth exploring.

3. Content creators

If you need quick, engaging AI-generated content, Grok 3’s fast response time and witty tone make it a strong writing assistant. It’s especially useful for:

• Crafting Twitter/X threads.
• Writing snappy ad copy.
• Generating humorous takes on trending topics. 

Final verdict: Is Grok 3 the future of AI?

Grok 3 is undeniably a bold entry into the AI space, offering a unique blend of personality, speed, and real-time capabilities. Its witty responses, smooth UI, and solid performance make it a strong contender for users who value engaging AI interactions over purely functional ones.

That said, it’s not the ultimate AI for every user. If customization, deep integrations, and structured content are your priorities, ChatGPT is still the better choice. If you’re after highly accurate, real-time information, Gemini’s deep Google integration makes it the more reliable option.

So, is Grok 3 the future of AI? 

Not yet. 

It has a lot of promise, but it still needs to refine accuracy, integrations, and customization options to truly compete with OpenAI and Google. If you’re looking for an AI with attitude and real-time insights, though, Grok 3 is definitely worth a shot.

FAQs about Grok 3

How is Grok 3 different from ChatGPT and Gemini?

• Grok 3: Best for humor, casual use, and real-time insights from X and the web.
• ChatGPT: Best for structured content, deep customization, and creativity.
• Gemini: Best for real-time fact-checking and Google-integrated research.

Is Grok 3 free?

Yes, but it’s temporary and offers limited capabilities. Grok 3 is available through X Premium+, which costs $40 monthly. A separate SuperGrok plan cost $30 monthly.

Can Grok 3 be used for professional work?

It depends. While it can assist with content creation and research, it lacks the depth and accuracy needed for critical business or academic work. For professional AI tools, ChatGPT or Gemini might be better.

Does Grok 3 support plugins or third-party integrations?

Yes, Grok 3 supports third-party integrations, particularly through its API, which allows developers to connect it with external applications and platforms. But it offers no plugins. 

What’s Grok 3’s strongest feature?

Grok3’s real-time web search and witty personality make it stand out. It’s great for keeping up with trending topics and engaging conversations.

Can I fine-tune Grok 3’s responses?

Not really. Unlike ChatGPT’s customization settings, Grok 3 offers limited ways to adjust its tone, memory, or output.

Should I switch to Grok 3 from ChatGPT or Gemini?

If you enjoy a more conversational AI with real-time capabilities, yes. But if you need deep customization (ChatGPT) or fact-based accuracy (Gemini), Grok 3 may not be your best option.

Disclaimer!

This publication, review, or article (“Content”) is based on our independent evaluation and is subjective, reflecting our opinions, which may differ from others’ perspectives or experiences. We do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the Content and disclaim responsibility for any errors or omissions it may contain.

The information provided is not investment advice and should not be treated as such, as products or services may change after publication. By engaging with our Content, you acknowledge its subjective nature and agree not to hold us liable for any losses or damages arising from your reliance on the information provided.

Always conduct your research and consult professionals where necessary.