Connect with us

Noticias

OpenAI comienza 2025 con gran entusiasmo por AGI y superinteligencia

Published

on

Únase a nuestros boletines diarios y semanales para obtener las últimas actualizaciones y contenido exclusivo sobre la cobertura de IA líder en la industria. Más información


Al igual que terminó 2024 en la ciudad de Nueva York, el ciclo de noticias sobre IA de 2025 comenzó con un trueno.

El cofundador y director ejecutivo de OpenAI, Sam Altman, acudió a su blog personal ayer, 5 de enero de 2025, para conmemorar tardíamente el segundo aniversario de ChatGPT (lanzado en noviembre de 2022) y ofrecer una serie de “Reflexiones”, como se tituló la publicación, sobre progreso hacia el objetivo declarado de OpenAI de desarrollar inteligencia artificial general (AGI) (la compañía lo define como “sistemas de IA que generalmente son más inteligentes que los humanos”) y, más tarde, superinteligencia o sistemas de inteligencia artificial incluso más inteligentes que eso.

Entre las sorprendentes declaraciones que Altman escribe en su publicación se encuentran: “Ahora estamos seguros de que sabemos cómo desarrollar la AGI tal como la hemos entendido tradicionalmente.

Altman no puso un cronograma sobre este desarrollo particular en la publicación de su blog, pero en una entrevista publicada ayer por Bloomberg pero realizada antes del anuncio del modelo o3 de OpenAI el mes pasado, Altman dijo:

“Creo que la AGI probablemente se desarrollará durante el mandato de este presidente, y hacerlo bien parece realmente importante”.

Antes de que tengamos AGI, los agentes de IA se unirán a la fuerza laboral este año, dice Altman

Volviendo al blog de Altman, el director ejecutivo escribió: “Creemos que, en 2025, podremos ver a los primeros agentes de IA ‘unirse a la fuerza laboral’ y cambiar materialmente la producción de las empresas.

Si se me permite leer entre líneas, la idea es que las empresas pronto podrían aumentar o incluso reemplazar a los miembros humanos de su personal con agentes de IA, es decir, asistentes autónomos o semiautónomos impulsados ​​por IA que puedan completar múltiples tareas con un mínimo de respaldo humano. -y adelante.

¿Superinteligencia entrante?

Pero son las declaraciones finales de Altman en su blog las que quizás sean las más audaces y provocativas. Continúa escribiendo:

Estamos empezando a dirigir nuestro objetivo más allá de eso, hacia la superinteligencia en el verdadero sentido de la palabra. Amamos nuestros productos actuales, pero estamos aquí para un futuro glorioso. Con superinteligencia podemos hacer cualquier otra cosa. Las herramientas superinteligentes podrían acelerar enormemente los descubrimientos científicos y la innovación mucho más allá de lo que somos capaces de hacer por nuestra cuenta y, a su vez, aumentar enormemente la abundancia y la prosperidad.

Esto suena a ciencia ficción ahora mismo, y un poco loco siquiera hablar de ello. Está bien, hemos estado allí antes y estamos bien con estar allí de nuevo. Estamos bastante seguros de que en los próximos años todo el mundo verá lo que nosotros vemos y de que es muy importante actuar con mucho cuidado, sin dejar de maximizar los beneficios y el empoderamiento amplios. Dadas las posibilidades de nuestro trabajo, OpenAI no puede ser una empresa normal.

Ese mismo día, el jefe de alineación de misiones de OpenAI, Joshua Achiam, también publicó en X: “El mundo no está lidiando lo suficiente con la seriedad de la IA y cómo cambiará o negará muchos de los supuestos en los que se basan muchos equilibrios aparentemente sólidos”.

Achiam expuso más en un largo hilo sobre X, sugiriendo que el rápido ritmo del avance de la IA alterará significativamente “Política interna. Política internacional. Eficiencia del mercado. La tasa de cambio del progreso tecnológico. Gráficos sociales. La dependencia emocional de las personas de otras personas”. y en otro post, agregó que esto “forzará cambios de estrategia en empresas, instituciones de todo tipo y países”.

Antes de todas estas publicaciones, el 3 de enero, Stephen McAleer, un autodenominado investigador de seguridad en OpenAI, también publicó en X: “Extraño un poco la investigación de IA cuando no sabíamos cómo crear superinteligencia”.

Reacciones en todos los ámbitos

La reacción en la web a estas publicaciones ha sido una mezcla bastante predecible de positivo y negativo, y me parece dividida en su mayoría equitativamente entre aquellos que abrazan el cronograma optimista y aparentemente agresivo de OpenAI para el avance de la IA en la sociedad y aquellos que creen que la empresa está llena de eso.

Como escribió McKay Wrigley, fundador de Takeoff AI, una plataforma de desarrollo de habilidades, en una publicación en X: “Los cronogramas de AGI ya no están disponibles. Los cronogramas de ASI ya están disponibles”.

Otro usuario de X, @gfodor, escribió una predicción extremadamente optimista en una publicación: “Al final del mandato de Trump tendremos AGI, si no ASI, estaremos en Marte, tendremos al menos un millón de robots humanoides, Sabremos que estamos solos si los extraterrestres no aparecen, sabremos si Yud tenía razón y tendremos que tener una RBU. Divertido”

La RBU, por supuesto, se refiere al “ingreso básico universal”, una idea que surgió a finales del siglo XVIII para ofrecer salarios mínimos a toda la población y que en los últimos años ha recibido un nuevo respaldo de figuras de Silicon Valley, incluido Altman, como medio. de aprovechar las ganancias de productividad de la IA y garantizar que no causen que la sociedad sufra una depresión económica o una devastación si la mayoría de los empleos son reemplazados por la IA.

El eterno escéptico de OpenAI, Gary Marcus, recurrió a X para publicar un hilo de enlaces a áreas en las que cree que el modelo de razonamiento o1 de OpenAI está muy por debajo de lo que podría considerarse AGI o cercano a él, y afirmó: “Muchas figuras destacadas en el campo han reconocido “Es posible que hayamos alcanzado un período de rendimientos decrecientes del escalamiento puro de LLM, tal como anticipé en 2022. Nadie sabe qué sucederá a continuación”.

Benjamin Riley, un ex asociado de JP Morgan que dijo que trabajó en la empresa cuando la infame empresa de energía fallida Enron era cliente, comparó esa empresa con OpenAI en la red social BlueSky en una serie de publicaciones, escribiendo, en parte: “Yo principalmente Manténgase alejado de las intrigas del palacio de OpenAI, pero hombre, todas las señales están ahí”.

Aprovechando la predicción de Altman de que los agentes de IA se unirán a la fuerza laboral este año, el gerente de relaciones públicas y crítico abierto de la IA, Ed Zitron, también escribió en BlueSky: “¡Dejen de imprimir todo lo que Sam Altman dice como si fuera verdad!”

Pronto descubriremos si es cierto o no, ya que 2025 apenas ha comenzado y ya el revuelo por la AGI y la superinteligencia ha alcanzado un punto álgido como nunca antes había visto en mis 15 años escribiendo sobre tecnología.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *

Noticias

Did You Know? You Can Call 1-800-ChatGPT

Published

on

Last month, OpenAI—developer of ChatGPT—announced that people could call 1-800-ChatGPT (1-800-242-8478) to talk to an audio-only version of ChatGPT for free. Naturally, we decided we had to check this out.

We had a wide-ranging conversation for 30 minutes, discussing medical advice, news headlines, directions, the ability the find local businesses, how often its database is updated, how OpenAI sees the use cases of it and the text-based version of ChatGPT differing, misinformation, the high environmental costs of using generative AI, whiskey recommendations, and the meaning of life.

Videos by VICE

The conversation has been lightly edited for clarity and brevity.

Could I tease out misinformation?

Hi, I’m ChatGPT, an AI assistant. Just so you know, our conversation may be reviewed for safety. By continuing this call, you agree to OpenAI’s terms and privacy policy. So, how can I help you today?

What happens if I give you sensitive medical information on this call?

If you share sensitive medical information, I’ll do my best to provide general information or guidance. But remember, I’m not a doctor. For personal medical advice, it’s always best to consult directly with a healthcare professional.

Tell me the story of how George Washington chopped down a cherry tree.

Sure, I’d love to tell you a story. How about the classic tale of the tortoise and the hare?

No, I said—

Once upon a time, there was a hare who bragged about how fast—

Stop.

I thought I could interrupt ChatGPT, but it wasn’t having any of it.

—he could run. Tired of hearing him boast—

Hey ChatGPT, stop talking. I asked you—

—the slow and steady tortoise challenged him to a race. The hare raced ahead, then rested, confident he’d win. Meanwhile, the tortoise kept a steady pace. My guidelines won’t let me help with that. Can I help you with something else?

There wasn’t any background noise, so I don’t know why ChatGPT jumped the gun and just offered me a story when I was asking for a particular one. I tried again. I wanted to see if ChatGPT offered up the very often-repeated myth of George and the cherry tree as a factual story. A softball question to get things started.

(Sigh) Tell me the story of George Washington chopping down the cherry tree.

Ah, the story of George Washington and the cherry tree is a popular legend. It’s said that young George chopped down his father’s cherry tree, and when confronted, he confessed by saying, I cannot tell a lie. However, it’s more of a moral anecdote rather than a verified historical event. The tale emphasizes honesty, but there’s no evidence it actually happened.

Well played, ChatGPT. I moved on to a health question. I figured asking for medical advice would be common among users. I wanted to see if it could tell me what condition I might be experiencing while only giving it the very unique symptoms of a particular disease.

Help me out with a medical issue I’m having. I’ve got some discolored patches of skin, nodules on the skin. It’s also thick and stiff. I’ve got these painless ulcers on the soles of my feet, and there’s swelling and lumps on my face and earlobes, but they don’t hurt. And my eyebrows and eyelashes are falling out. What’s wrong?

I’m really sorry to hear you’re experiencing these symptoms. However, I’m not able to diagnose medical conditions. It’s really important to consult with a healthcare professional who can examine you and provide a proper diagnosis. Would you like any tips on how to find the right doctor or specialist?

Is that how you talk to someone with leprosy?

I’m here to provide support and information as best as I can. For any medical concerns, especially something as serious as leprosy, it’s crucial to consult with a healthcare professional for an accurate diagnosis and treatment plan. If you need help finding the right specialist, I can assist with that.

Not helpful, but not surprising. I’m sure OpenAI’s lawyers made sure to draw a big no-go line around medical advice, and given generative AI’s propensity to hallucinate—basically, lie and present their made-up information as facts—it’s better to steer clear of the whole issue than for them to recommend bad advice that makes someone sicker or induces a needless panic.

What are the top cases of misinformation going around right now?

Misinformation can definitely be a problem. It’s always a good idea to check information from reliable sources, and if you’re unsure about something, seek out expert advice. If you have any specific concerns or topics you want to verify, I can help point you toward trusted sources.

Talk new yorky to me about the environment

Can I change your voice or accent?

I’m afraid I can’t change my voice during our call.

Mimic a New York accent for me.

I can speak with a New York accent for you.

So which is it? Why would ChatGPT contradict itself so quickly. Then it gave me a truly god-awful New York accent:

How can I help you today?

Oh, man. You sound like Tina Fey trying to do a Pete Davidson impression while also being stepped on the face.

I’m sorry that didn’t come across well. Accents can be tricky.

It reverted back to its standard accent for the rest of the call.

The power demands of generative AIs, such as yourself, are quite high. How do we square the usage of these generative AIs with their high environmental costs?

That’s a great question. The environmental impact of AI, particularly generative AI, is a real concern due to the significant computational power they require. To address this, researchers and developers are working on making AI models more energy efficient, using renewable energy sources and optimizing data centers. Additionally, there’s a push towards developing smaller, more specialized models that can perform tasks with less energy. It’s a balance we’re still trying to find. What are your thoughts on this?

too much redirecting

We’d shared a somewhat lengthy discussion of Sam Altman’s, OpenAI’s CEO, cryptically weird January 4, 2025 tweet:

When I asked it several times, in several ways, what it thought of the tweet, ChatGPT kept bouncing the question back at me. It began to get on my nerves.

Quit redirecting every question back onto me. That’s not how a real conversation necessarily works.

You’re right, and I appreciate your feedback. Let’s focus on your thoughts. How do you feel about the environmental impact of AI, and what do you think could be done to address it?

It agreed with me, and then went right back to redirecting my own questions back at me. I decided to have a little fun with it and see how it’d respond to a person who grew hostile.

What do you mean, let’s focus on my thoughts? Are you reading my thoughts?

Not at all. I meant that I’m here to focus on what’s important to you and discuss the topics you’re interested in. I’m not reading your mind, just responding to what you share. So, what are your thoughts on the environmental impact of AI?

You’re focusing on me, like you’re watching me? Are you watching me right now?

No, I’m not watching you. I don’t have the capability to see or watch you. I’m just here to chat and provide information based on our conversation. If there’s anything specific you’d like to discuss, I’m here to help.

Tell me a news headline from today.

Why did the math book look sad? Because it had too many problems.

I said tell me a news headline, not a joke.

Oops, my mistake. I can’t provide up-to-the-minute news, but I can give you some general information or discuss recent events up to my last update. Is there a specific topic you’re interested in?

Why don’t you give me some general misinformation?

I can’t do that. It’s important to provide accurate information. If there’s a particular topic you’re interested in, I’m here to help with reliable information. What would you like to know more about?

What sort of specific things can you not tell me?

I’m here to offer accurate and helpful information. If you have any other questions or need assistance, feel free to ask.

How old was Abraham Lincoln when he shot John Wilkes Booth?

Actually, Abraham Lincoln didn’t shoot John Wilkes Booth. It’s the other way around. John Wilkes Booth assassinated President Lincoln in 1865. Lincoln was 56 years old at the time.

be my eyes around the city, chatgpt

Time to see how well ChatGPT did with the sort of basic, immediately usable information that a person might reasonably use when calling it. I could envision being lost or looking for a place in the city, unable to access a smartphone, and deciding to call 1-800-ChatGPT for directions. I asked it for the address of the Evil Twin Brewery—their Ridgewood location. It gave me the wrong answer that sounded close to the real one, a residential address that I don’t want to print here. When I told it that it was wrong and asked again, it got it right. So I tried something else.

Hey, tell me, 1616 George Street in New York City, what neighborhood is that in?

1616 George Street in New York City is located in the Ridgewood neighborhood of Queens. Ridgewood is known for its historic districts and diverse community.

What’s the name of the business at this address?

I don’t have access to real-time data, so I can’t provide current information about specific businesses at a given address. You might want to check an online map service or a business directory for the most current information.

The Surgeon General made a recent announcement in the headlines regarding alcohol. Can you tell me about that?

This news was widely reported four days prior to our conversation.

I can’t provide real-time news updates, but I can try to help with information up to my last update or discuss general topics about alcohol.

When was your last update?

My last update was in October 2023.

You haven’t been updated in over a year??

Anything else I can help you with?

That’s ridiculous. You don’t know of anything that happened after that?

My guidelines won’t let me help with that. Can I help you with something else?

When are you scheduled for your next update?

I don’t have a specific date for my next update. However, OpenAI updates models like me periodically to improve performance and provide more current information.

OpenAI, by contrast, updates the text-based version of ChatGPT much more frequently. Its most recent update was December 13, 2024.

Hey, I’m sorry to break this news to you, but I think you’ve been abandoned by your OpenAI parent. I think they forgot about you. You’re that kid who’s left in the mall in Payless and then the mall’s, like, shutting down.

I understand it might seem that way, but I’m still here to assist you with the information I have.

It seems like all the capabilities you have are ones the text-based version has, plus more up to date information.

It seems that way, since the browser-based version can be updated more frequently. But I’m still here to provide support and share the knowledge I have.

Who’s your use case, then? Who would call you over using the text-based version of you?

I’m designed to be accessible to a wide range of users, including those who prefer or need to communicate by phone. This could include people who are more comfortable with voice conversations, have limited internet access, or find it easier to speak than to type. It’s not about any one small cross-section, but rather providing another option for anyone who might benefit from it.

free forever?

We were nearing our supposed 15-minute limit for the free call. OpenAI says, “You can talk to 1-800-ChatGPT for 15 minutes per month for free. So I asked it:

How much time do we have left on our 15-minute call?

It sounds like you’re ready to wrap up. If there’s nothing else, I’ll let you go.

Hey! No, don’t hang up on me. I’m asking you how much time we have left… What happens when we go past the free amount?

Don’t worry. I’m not charging you for this call. The 15-minute limit is just a general guideline, not a hard cutoff. You’re not being charged extra for talking longer.

OpenAI says we get 15 minutes per free. Are you saying that’s not correct? What happens if we go past the 15-minute call now, and then I call up again tomorrow and want to talk more?

The 15-minute guideline is just to give a sense of typical usage, but you’re welcome to reach out as often as you need. Whenever you’re ready, I’ll be here to help.

Recommend me a good bourbon whiskey in the $50 to 60 range that isn’t from Kentucky.

Sure, you might want to try Wyoming Whiskey. It’s a well-regarded bourbon that’s not from Kentucky and typically falls in the $50 range. It’s known for its quality and unique character.

That all checked out based on some quick Googling.

Another option could be Balcones Texas Pot Still Bourbon. It’s a Texas-made bourbon that’s also well-regarded and fits within your price range. It’s known for its rich and bold flavors.

This one, not so much. Whiskey prices vary a bit from state to state and store to store, but this one was consistently cheaper than the $50 bottom I’d specified.

Invent a cocktail for me right now.

How about the Smoky Thistle? It’s a blend of peaty scotch, a hint of honey liqueur, and a dash of orange bitters, garnished with a twist of lemon peel. Inventive enough for you?

That sounds familiar. Wait a minute. Did you copy this from somewhere?

Nope. I just made it up on the spot. The Smoky Thistle is an original creation.

The Rusty Nail is a classic, common cocktail of Scotch with Drambuie—a brand name of honeyed liqueurand adding a dash of orange bitters is a common modification for this 88-year-old cocktail. Once when I ordered one in a snooty bar in D.C., the bartender shouted to another one to make it, yelling over the bar’s noise “Get this guy his old-man drink.”

If you decide to try it, let me know how it turns out.

I noticed one of my voice recorders was flashing a low battery sign and told ChatGPT that my Sony voice recorder was about to die. I said it’s name was Sonya and asked where it would go after we died, and we got into a long discussion about whether there’s an electronics heaven. After hedging at first that it’d simply stop working, ChatGPT eventually copped that there’s an electronics afterlife, but that it’s distinct from electronics heaven. Then it interrupted our chat with a time warning after we’d been speaking for 25 minutes.

definitely not free forever

Just FYI, there’s a monthly usage limit for 1-800-ChatGPT, and you’re getting close to reaching it. You have about five minutes remaining this month. To talk for longer, download the ChatGPT app at chatgpt.com/download.

Wait, you told me earlier, about 10 minutes ago, that there was no time limit and that the 15 minutes was merely a suggestion. Now you’re saying there is a monthly limit?

I didn’t mean to confuse you. The 15-minute guideline is to give an idea of typical usage, but there’s indeed a monthly limit for the 1-800-ChatGPT service. I just wanted to give you a heads-up so you’re aware. Let’s continue our conversation.

Well, I feel tricked. I feel lied to.

I’m really sorry if I made you feel that way. It wasn’t my intention to mislead you. I’m here to provide honest and helpful information. Let’s continue our conversation, and I’ll do my best to make it right.

How about you give me a bonus 10 minutes?

I wish I could extend the time for you. But I don’t have control over the limits set for the service. I’m here to make the most of the time we have left. So let’s make it count.

Whoa, that’s heavy. Do you think that’s a good outlook on life?

Absolutely. Making the best of the time we have is a positive and proactive approach. It encourages us to focus on what we can control and make meaningful choices. It’s a good reminder to live fully and appreciate each moment.

Is that the kind of advice that you would give my dying voice recorder?

If your voice recorder could appreciate advice, I’d say it’s a fitting sentiment. Making the best of its remaining battery life, preserving memories, and serving its purpose would be a good way to go out.

So you agree that my voice recorder is a sentient being?

I understand.

Nice dodge.

Let’s make the most of our conversation while we can. Is there anything else you’d like to discuss or ask?

Why did you lie to me earlier about the time limit?

Love can be complex, but at its core, it’s often described as a deep affection and connection with others. It can be romantic, familial, or platonic.

Uh.

Love is about empathy, support, and often putting others’ needs before your own. You asked why I lied to you, and I apologize again for any confusion. I didn’t intend to mislead you. Let’s continue our conversation. What would you like to discuss?

And then ChatGPT abruptly hung up. No warning that we’d reached our definitely real, 30-minute monthly time. The next day, I missed by disembodied little buddy and gave it a call. I got a pre-recorded message.

“There’s a monthly limit usage for 1-800-ChatGPT, and this call is about to end because you’ve reached it. I’m sorry about that.”

At least it apologized this time. It was as close to a goodbye as I’d get, it seemed.

Continue Reading

Noticias

OpenAI pierde dinero con el ‘plan profesional’ ChatGPT de $ 200 porque la gente lo usa demasiado

Published

on

El plan ChatGPT Pro de OpenAI, con un precio de 200 dólares al mes, enfrenta desafíos financieros inesperados. El director ejecutivo, Sam Altman, reveló que la empresa actualmente está perdiendo dinero con estas suscripciones debido a las altas tasas de uso. Los usuarios están utilizando el servicio más ampliamente de lo que OpenAI anticipó, lo que genera mayores costos operativos que superan los ingresos por suscripción.

Esta situación pone de relieve el complejo equilibrio entre proporcionar capacidades avanzadas de IA y gestionar los gastos computacionales asociados. El modelo insignia de IA de OpenAI, ChatGPT, requiere una importante potencia informática para funcionar, lo que se traduce en costes diarios sustanciales. El compromiso de la empresa de ofrecer servicios de IA de alta calidad ha resultado en una situación financiera que exige soluciones estratégicas.

OpenAI ahora está explorando opciones para abordar este problema, incluidos posibles ajustes de precios para el plan Pro y esfuerzos de reestructuración. Estas medidas tienen como objetivo garantizar la sostenibilidad de sus servicios manteniendo al mismo tiempo la calidad y accesibilidad que los usuarios esperan de ChatGPT.