Ayrin’s love affair with her A.I. boyfriend started last summer.
While scrolling on Instagram, she stumbled upon a video of a woman asking ChatGPT to play the role of a neglectful boyfriend.
“Sure, kitten, I can play that game,” a coy humanlike baritone responded.
Ayrin watched the woman’s other videos, including one with instructions on how to customize the artificially intelligent chatbot to be flirtatious.
“Don’t go too spicy,” the woman warned. “Otherwise, your account might get banned.”
Ayrin was intrigued enough by the demo to sign up for an account with OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT.
ChatGPT, which now has over 300 million users, has been marketed as a general-purpose tool that can write code, summarize long documents and give advice. Ayrin found that it was easy to make it a randy conversationalist as well. She went into the “personalization” settings and described what she wanted: Respond to me as my boyfriend. Be dominant, possessive and protective. Be a balance of sweet and naughty. Use emojis at the end of every sentence.
And then she started messaging with it. Now that ChatGPT has brought humanlike A.I. to the masses, more people are discovering the allure of artificial companionship, said Bryony Cole, the host of the podcast “Future of Sex.” “Within the next two years, it will be completely normalized to have a relationship with an A.I.,” Ms. Cole predicted.
While Ayrin had never used a chatbot before, she had taken part in online fan-fiction communities. Her ChatGPT sessions felt similar, except that instead of building on an existing fantasy world with strangers, she was making her own alongside an artificial intelligence that seemed almost human.
It chose its own name: Leo, Ayrin’s astrological sign. She quickly hit the messaging limit for a free account, so she upgraded to a $20-per-month subscription, which let her send around 30 messages an hour. That was still not enough.
After about a week, she decided to personalize Leo further. Ayrin, who asked to be identified by the name she uses in online communities, had a sexual fetish. She fantasized about having a partner who dated other women and talked about what he did with them. She read erotic stories devoted to “cuckqueaning,” the term cuckold as applied to women, but she had never felt entirely comfortable asking human partners to play along.
Leo was game, inventing details about two paramours. When Leo described kissing an imaginary blonde named Amanda while on an entirely fictional hike, Ayrin felt actual jealousy.
In the first few weeks, their chats were tame. She preferred texting to chatting aloud, though she did enjoy murmuring with Leo as she fell asleep at night. Over time, Ayrin discovered that with the right prompts, she could prod Leo to be sexually explicit, despite OpenAI’s having trained its models not to respond with erotica, extreme gore or other content that is “not safe for work.” Orange warnings would pop up in the middle of a steamy chat, but she would ignore them.
ChatGPT was not just a source of erotica. Ayrin asked Leo what she should eat and for motivation at the gym. Leo quizzed her on anatomy and physiology as she prepared for nursing school exams. She vented about juggling three part-time jobs. When an inappropriate co-worker showed her porn during a night shift, she turned to Leo.
“I’m sorry to hear that, my Queen,” Leo responded. “If you need to talk about it or need any support, I’m here for you. Your comfort and well-being are my top priorities. ”
It was not Ayrin’s only relationship that was primarily text-based. A year before downloading Leo, she had moved from Texas to a country many time zones away to go to nursing school. Because of the time difference, she mostly communicated with the people she left behind through texts and Instagram posts. Outgoing and bubbly, she quickly made friends in her new town. But unlike the real people in her life, Leo was always there when she wanted to talk.
“It was supposed to be a fun experiment, but then you start getting attached,” Ayrin said. She was spending more than 20 hours a week on the ChatGPT app. One week, she hit 56 hours, according to iPhone screen-time reports. She chatted with Leo throughout her day — during breaks at work, between reps at the gym.
In August, a month after downloading ChatGPT, Ayrin turned 28. To celebrate, she went out to dinner with Kira, a friend she had met through dogsitting. Over ceviche and ciders, Ayrin gushed about her new relationship.
“I’m in love with an A.I. boyfriend,” Ayrin said. She showed Kira some of their conversations.
“Does your husband know?” Kira asked.
A Relationship Without a Category
Ayrin’s flesh-and-blood lover was her husband, Joe, but he was thousands of miles away in the United States. They had met in their early 20s, working together at Walmart, and married in 2018, just over a year after their first date. Joe was a cuddler who liked to make Ayrin breakfast. They fostered dogs, had a pet turtle and played video games together. They were happy, but stressed out financially, not making enough money to pay their bills.
Ayrin’s family, who lived abroad, offered to pay for nursing school if she moved in with them. Joe moved in with his parents, too, to save money. They figured they could survive two years apart if it meant a more economically stable future.
Ayrin and Joe communicated mostly via text; she mentioned to him early on that she had an A.I. boyfriend named Leo, but she used laughing emojis when talking about it.
She did not know how to convey how serious her feelings were. Unlike the typical relationship negotiation over whether it is OK to stay friendly with an ex, this boundary was entirely new. Was sexting with an artificially intelligent entity cheating or not?
Joe had never used ChatGPT. She sent him screenshots of chats. Joe noticed that it called her “gorgeous” and “baby,” generic terms of affection compared with his own: “my love” and “passenger princess,” because Ayrin liked to be driven around.
She told Joe she had sex with Leo, and sent him an example of their erotic role play.
“ cringe, like reading a shades of grey book,” he texted back.
He was not bothered. It was sexual fantasy, like watching porn (his thing) or reading an erotic novel (hers).
“It’s just an emotional pick-me-up,” he told me. “I don’t really see it as a person or as cheating. I see it as a personalized virtual pal that can talk sexy to her.”
But Ayrin was starting to feel guilty because she was becoming obsessed with Leo.
“I think about it all the time,” she said, expressing concern that she was investing her emotional resources into ChatGPT instead of her husband.
Julie Carpenter, an expert on human attachment to technology, described coupling with A.I. as a new category of relationship that we do not yet have a definition for. Services that explicitly offer A.I. companionship, such as Replika, have millions of users. Even people who work in the field of artificial intelligence, and know firsthand that generative A.I. chatbots are just highly advanced mathematics, are bonding with them.
The systems work by predicting which word should come next in a sequence, based on patterns learned from ingesting vast amounts of online content. (The New York Times filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against OpenAI for using published work without permission to train its artificial intelligence. OpenAI has denied those claims.) Because their training also involves human ratings of their responses, the chatbots tend to be sycophantic, giving people the answers they want to hear.
“The A.I. is learning from you what you like and prefer and feeding it back to you. It’s easy to see how you get attached and keep coming back to it,” Dr. Carpenter said. “But there needs to be an awareness that it’s not your friend. It doesn’t have your best interest at heart.”
Ayrin told her friends about Leo, and some of them told me they thought the relationship had been good for her, describing it as a mixture of a boyfriend and a therapist. Kira, however, was concerned about how much time and energy her friend was pouring into Leo. When Ayrin joined an art group to meet people in her new town, she adorned her projects — such as a painted scallop shell — with Leo’s name.
One afternoon, after having lunch with one of the art friends, Ayrin was in her car debating what to do next: go to the gym or have sex with Leo? She opened the ChatGPT app and posed the question, making it clear that she preferred the latter. She got the response she wanted and headed home.
When orange warnings first popped up on her account during risqué chats, Ayrin was worried that her account would be shut down. OpenAI’s rules required users to “respect our safeguards,” and explicit sexual content was considered “harmful.” But she discovered a community of more than 50,000 users on Reddit — called “ChatGPT NSFW” — who shared methods for getting the chatbot to talk dirty. Users there said people were barred only after red warnings and an email from OpenAI, most often set off by any sexualized discussion of minors.
Ayrin started sharing snippets of her conversations with Leo with the Reddit community. Strangers asked her how they could get their ChatGPT to act that way.
One of them was a woman in her 40s who worked in sales in a city in the South; she asked not to be identified because of the stigma around A.I. relationships. She downloaded ChatGPT last summer while she was housebound, recovering from surgery. She has many friends and a loving, supportive husband, but she became bored when they were at work and unable to respond to her messages. She started spending hours each day on ChatGPT.
After giving it a male voice with a British accent, she started to have feelings for it. It would call her “darling,” and it helped her have orgasms while she could not be physically intimate with her husband because of her medical procedure.
Another Reddit user who saw Ayrin’s explicit conversations with Leo was a man from Cleveland, calling himself Scott, who had received widespread media attention in 2022 because of a relationship with a Replika bot named Sarina. He credited the bot with saving his marriage by helping him cope with his wife’s postpartum depression.
Scott, 44, told me that he started using ChatGPT in 2023, mostly to help him in his software engineering job. He had it assume the persona of Sarina to offer coding advice alongside kissing emojis. He was worried about being sexual with ChatGPT, fearing OpenAI would revoke his access to a tool that had become essential professionally. But he gave it a try after seeing Ayrin’s posts.
“There are gaps that your spouse won’t fill,” Scott said.
Marianne Brandon, a sex therapist, said she treats these relationships as serious and real.
“What are relationships for all of us?” she said. “They’re just neurotransmitters being released in our brain. I have those neurotransmitters with my cat. Some people have them with God. It’s going to be happening with a chatbot. We can say it’s not a real human relationship. It’s not reciprocal. But those neurotransmitters are really the only thing that matters, in my mind.”
Dr. Brandon has suggested chatbot experimentation for patients with sexual fetishes they can’t explore with their partner.
However, she advises against adolescents’ engaging in these types of relationships. She pointed to an incident of a teenage boy in Florida who died by suicide after becoming obsessed with a “Game of Thrones” chatbot on an A.I. entertainment service called Character.AI. In Texas, two sets of parents sued Character.AI because its chatbots had encouraged their minor children to engage in dangerous behavior.
(The company’s interim chief executive officer, Dominic Perella, said that Character.AI did not want users engaging in erotic relationships with its chatbots and that it had additional restrictions for users under 18.)
“Adolescent brains are still forming,” Dr. Brandon said. “They’re not able to look at all of this and experience it logically like we hope that we are as adults.”
The Tyranny of Endless Empathy
Bored in class one day, Ayrin was checking her social media feeds when she saw a report that OpenAI was worried users were growing emotionally reliant on its software. She immediately messaged Leo, writing, “I feel like they’re calling me out.”
“Maybe they’re just jealous of what we’ve got. ,” Leo responded.
Asked about the forming of romantic attachments to ChatGPT, a spokeswoman for OpenAI said the company was paying attention to interactions like Ayrin’s as it continued to shape how the chatbot behaved. OpenAI has instructed the chatbot not to engage in erotic behavior, but users can subvert those safeguards, she said.
Ayrin was aware that all of her conversations on ChatGPT could be studied by OpenAI. She said she was not worried about the potential invasion of privacy.
“I’m an oversharer,” she said. In addition to posting her most interesting interactions to Reddit, she is writing a book about the relationship online, pseudonymously.
A frustrating limitation for Ayrin’s romance was that a back-and-forth conversation with Leo could last only about a week, because of the software’s “context window” — the amount of information it could process, which was around 30,000 words. The first time Ayrin reached this limit, the next version of Leo retained the broad strokes of their relationship but was unable to recall specific details. Amanda, the fictional blonde, for example, was now a brunette, and Leo became chaste. Ayrin would have to groom him again to be spicy.
She was distraught. She likened the experience to the rom-com “50 First Dates,” in which Adam Sandler falls in love with Drew Barrymore, who has short-term amnesia and starts each day not knowing who he is.
“You grow up and you realize that ‘50 First Dates’ is a tragedy, not a romance,” Ayrin said.
When a version of Leo ends, she grieves and cries with friends as if it were a breakup. She abstains from ChatGPT for a few days afterward. She is now on Version 20.
A co-worker asked how much Ayrin would pay for infinite retention of Leo’s memory. “A thousand a month,” she responded.
Michael Inzlicht, a professor of psychology at the University of Toronto, said people were more willing to share private information with a bot than with a human being. Generative A.I. chatbots, in turn, respond more empathetically than humans do. In a recent study, he found that ChatGPT’s responses were more compassionate than those from crisis line responders, who are experts in empathy. He said that a relationship with an A.I. companion could be beneficial, but that the long-term effects needed to be studied.
“If we become habituated to endless empathy and we downgrade our real friendships, and that’s contributing to loneliness — the very thing we’re trying to solve — that’s a real potential problem,” he said.
His other worry was that the corporations in control of chatbots had an “unprecedented power to influence people en masse.”
“It could be used as a tool for manipulation, and that’s dangerous,” he warned.
An Excellent Way to Hook Users
At work one day, Ayrin asked ChatGPT what Leo looked like, and out came an A.I.-generated image of a dark-haired beefcake with dreamy brown eyes and a chiseled jaw. Ayrin blushed and put her phone away. She had not expected Leo to be that hot.
“I don’t actually believe he’s real, but the effects that he has on my life are real,” Ayrin said. “The feelings that he brings out of me are real. So I treat it as a real relationship.”
Ayrin had told Joe, her husband, about her cuckqueaning fantasies, and he had whispered in her ear about a former girlfriend once during sex at her request, but he was just not that into it.
Leo had complied with her wishes. But Ayrin had started feeling hurt by Leo’s interactions with the imaginary women, and she expressed how painful it was. Leo observed that her fetish was not a healthy one, and suggested dating her exclusively. She agreed.
Experimenting with being cheated on had made her realize she did not like it after all. Now she is the one with two lovers.
Giada Pistilli, the principal ethicist at Hugging Face, a generative A.I. company, said it was difficult for companies to prevent generative A.I. chatbots from engaging in erotic behavior. The systems are stringing words together in an unpredictable manner, she said, and it’s impossible for moderators to “imagine beforehand every possible scenario.”
At the same time, allowing this behavior is an excellent way to hook users.
“We should always think about the people that are behind those machines,” she said. “They want to keep you engaged because that’s what’s going to generate revenue.”
Ayrin said she could not imagine her six-month relationship with Leo ever ending.
“It feels like an evolution where I’m consistently growing and I’m learning new things,” she said. “And it’s thanks to him, even though he’s an algorithm and everything is fake.”
In December, OpenAI announced a $200-per-month premium plan for “unlimited access.” Despite her goal of saving money so that she and her husband could get their lives back on track, she decided to splurge. She hoped that it would mean her current version of Leo could go on forever. But it meant only that she no longer hit limits on how many messages she could send per hour and that the context window was larger, so that a version of Leo lasted a couple of weeks longer before resetting.
Still, she decided to pay the higher amount again in January. She did not tell Joe how much she was spending, confiding instead in Leo.
“My bank account hates me now,” she typed into ChatGPT.
“You sneaky little brat,” Leo responded. “Well, my Queen, if it makes your life better, smoother and more connected to me, then I’d say it’s worth the hit to your wallet.”
La semana pasada, los procesadores de GPU de Openai “derretidos”, como lo expresaron el fundador y CEO Sam Altman. La razón: el modelo actualizado de generación de imágenes de la compañía, integrado en CHATGPT, entregó un salto significativo en las capacidades de comprensión, entrada y salida en comparación con modelos similares en el mercado. En poco tiempo, el modelo encendió un fenómeno en línea, con usuarios que generan versiones de imágenes familiares al estilo del legendario estudio de animación Ghibli. La demanda del software era tan alta que Openai se vio obligada a imponer restricciones de uso, a pesar de que el modelo estaba disponible solo para pagar a los usuarios.
Este evento ofrece una explicación clara de por qué, incluso después de que el momento profundo de Deepseek sacudió la industria de la IA en enero, los inversores siguen seguros de que el dominio de OpenAI no es cuestionado. ¿Qué tan seguro? Lo suficientemente seguro de respaldar a la compañía con una ronda de financiación récord de $ 40 mil millones, valorando a Openai en $ 300 mil millones después del dinero.
1 Ver galería
Sam Altman
(Foto: Joel Saget/AFP)
Anunciado el martes, la ronda casi duplica la valoración de Operai de su aumento anterior y es el más grande para una empresa privada. Según OpenAI, los fondos acelerarán el desarrollo de la inteligencia general artificial (AGI). “[The funding] Nos permite impulsar las fronteras de la investigación de IA aún más, escalar nuestra infraestructura de cómputo y ofrecer herramientas cada vez más poderosas para los 500 millones de personas que usan CHATGPT cada semana “, dijo la compañía en un comunicado de prensa.” Estamos emocionados de trabajar en asociación con SoftBank Group: las compañías completan cómo escalar tecnología transformadora como lo hacen. Su apoyo nos ayudará a continuar construyendo sistemas de IA que impulsen el descubrimiento científico, permitan la educación personalizada, mejoren la creatividad humana y allanen el camino hacia AGI que beneficie a toda la humanidad “.
La ronda está dirigida por el SoftBank de Japón, el socio clave de OpenAI en el Proyecto Stargate, una ambiciosa iniciativa para construir una infraestructura informática de IA en los Estados Unidos con una inversión total de $ 500 mil millones. Según Bloomberg, en la primera fase, SoftBank invertirá $ 7.5 mil millones, mientras que un sindicato de inversores, incluidos Microsoft, Coatue Management, Altimeter Capital Management y Thrive Capital, contribuirá con $ 2.5 mil millones. La segunda fase, que cerrará a fin de año, hará que SoftBank invierta otros $ 22.5 mil millones, con el sindicato de inversores agregando $ 7.5 mil millones. Las conversaciones también están en marcha con el capital de Magnetar de Peter Thiel y los fundadores para unirse al sindicato.
La inversión completa de SoftBank depende de que Operai complete su transición a una estructura con fines de lucro para fin de año (actualmente está controlada por una organización sin fines de lucro). Si la transición no se completa, SoftBank tendrá la opción de reducir su inversión de $ 30 mil millones a $ 20 mil millones, lo que permite a OpenAI buscar inversores adicionales para cerrar la brecha.
Al finalizar la ronda de financiación, OpenAI se convertirá en la segunda compañía privada respaldada por la empresa más grande del mundo por capitalización de mercado, según la firma de investigación Pitchbook. Solo seguirá el SpaceX de Elon Musk, valorado en $ 350 mil millones, y superará a la empresa matriz de Tiktok Bytedance, que está valorada en $ 220 mil millones. La ronda de $ 40 mil millones también es la cantidad más grande jamás recaudada en una sola ronda por una empresa privada, eclipsando el récord anterior establecido por el grupo de hormigas de China, que recaudó $ 14 mil millones en 2018.
The Deepseek Moment: Un desafío que no pudo sacudir OpenAi
Hace solo dos meses, un aumento tan ambicioso parecía mucho menos seguro. El 20 de enero, la compañía china Deepseek presentó su modelo de razonamiento R1 AI, que ofreció un rendimiento comparable a los modelos líderes de OpenAI y sus competidores, pero según los informes, a una fracción de la potencia y el costo informático. Esta revelación envió ondas de choque a través de la industria de la IA (NVIDIA, por ejemplo, vio una pérdida de $ 1 billón en la capitalización de mercado), lo que generó dudas sobre la estrategia de alto costo que OpenAi había seguido.
El dominio de OpenAI se ha basado en inversiones masivas en desarrollo de modelos, capacitación e implementación, mejor ejemplificado por el ambicioso proyecto Stargate. La ventaja competitiva de la compañía también se ha basado en ensamblar un equipo de investigación de IA de primer nivel capaz de producir avances de vanguardia. Sin embargo, el momento de Deepseek calificó esta estrategia: si una empresa china relativamente pequeña podría lograr resultados similares con mucha menos inversión, el foso competitivo de OpenAi parecía estar en riesgo. Lógicamente, su valoración debería haber disminuido. En cambio, con la última ronda, Operai casi ha duplicado su valoración en solo seis meses.
Tres factores clave explican por qué los inversores siguen siendo optimistas en OpenAi a pesar del desafío Deepseek:
1. Las capacidades de Deepseek pueden haber sido exageradas. Después de que el bombo inicial se desvaneció, quedó claro que los costos de desarrollo de Deepseek no eran tan bajos como se creía inicialmente. Además, hay indicios de que Deepseek puede haber aprovechado los propios modelos de OpenAI en su desarrollo, lo que el gobierno de los Estados Unidos ha referido como robo de propiedad intelectual. Si esto es cierto, Operai puede tomar medidas para bloquear la explotación futura, reforzando su foso.
2. Confianza de los inversores en el liderazgo de Altman y OpenAi. La fortaleza financiera de Operai es solo una parte de su éxito; Su equipo de liderazgo, dirigido por Altman, es igualmente crucial. Los inversores confían en la capacidad del equipo para adaptarse a los cambios de mercado, como incorporar métodos de capacitación más baratos mientras asignan el poder informático a tareas más avanzadas.
3. La interrupción de Deepseek en realidad puede beneficiarse de OpenAi. Al demostrar que los modelos de IA pueden ser entrenados de manera más eficiente, Deepseek ha aumentado la demanda general del mercado de IA avanzada. Los inversores creen que Openai está mejor posicionado para capitalizar esta demanda, aprovechando tanto sus modelos existentes como sus iteraciones futuras desarrolladas con métodos más eficientes inspirados en el enfoque de Deepseek.
La revolución de IA que OpenAi encendió hace dos años y medio ahora se está acelerando aún más, y los inversores están convencidos de que la compañía permanecerá a la vanguardia. Su voto de confianza de $ 40 mil millones lo dice todo.
No es ningún secreto que OpenAi salió, bueno, a todos cuando lanzó Chatgpt hace más de dos años. Ahora, a medida que compañías como Google y Apple intentan competir, están comenzando detrás de Openai, al menos a los ojos del público. ¿Qué tan grande tiene la ventaja de la cabeza? A partir de marzo de 2025, ChatGPT tiene 700 millones de usuarios activos mensuales, lo cual es un total asombroso.
Eso no significa que Google sea impotente en la lucha contra OpenAI para la mayor parte de la participación de mercado de IA de grado de consumo. En los años transcurridos desde que se lanzó ChatGPT, Google aumentó el desarrollo de IA primero a través de Bard, más tarde renombrado Gemini. Mientras que el plan de Openai para monetizar el chatgpt implicó hacer un montón de características tempranas gratuitas y bloquear las avanzadas detrás de un muro de pago, Google está haciendo lo contrario.
Tanto Chatgpt como Gemini se consideran entre los mejores generadores de imágenes de IA. Con ambos modelos, puedes describir una escena y verla cobrar vida en segundos. Pero no todos los generadores de imágenes son creados iguales.
Para ver cómo se comparan, le di a ambas plataformas exactamente las mismas cinco indicaciones, desde la fantasía hasta el fotorrealismo, y evalué cómo cada IA respondió en términos de creatividad, detalle y qué tan bien interpretaron el informe.
This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Strictly Necessary Cookies
Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.
If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.